527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403062)
1. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons.
Kodish E; Stocking C; Ratain MJ; Kohrman A; Siegler M
J Clin Oncol; 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 1403062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.
Daugherty CK
J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17. PubMed ID: 10334550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute care research: is it ethical?
Iserson KV; Mahowald MB
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jul; 20(7):1032-7. PubMed ID: 1617973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents.
Ratain MJ; Mick R; Schilsky RL; Siegler M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(20):1637-43. PubMed ID: 8411243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of institutional review board and informed consent practices in EMS research.
Kim DT; Spivey WH
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8273962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRB Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: A National Survey of IRB Chairpersons.
Weissman JS; Campbell EG; Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Largent EA; Gupta A; Rozenblum R; Abraham M; Spikes K; Fagan M; Carnie M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 29902953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
Klitzman R
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?
Shah S; Whittle A; Wilfond B; Gensler G; Wendler D
JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 14747505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 8683820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.
Goldman J; Katz MD
JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7045428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations of informed consent for in utero gene transfer research: implications for investigators and institutional review boards.
Burger IM; Wilfond BS
Hum Gene Ther; 2000 May; 11(7):1057-63. PubMed ID: 10811234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research ethics.
Aarons D
West Indian Med J; 1995 Dec; 44(4):115-8. PubMed ID: 8838046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical considerations in clinical neuroscience. Current concepts in neuroclinical trials.
Alves WA; Macciocchi SN
Stroke; 1996 Oct; 27(10):1903-9. PubMed ID: 8841351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical review of clinical research.
Williams J
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Nov; No. 93():28-30. PubMed ID: 11659714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Demarcating research and treatment: a systematic approach for the analysis of the ethics of clinical research.
Freedman B; Fuks A; Weijer C
Clin Res; 1992 Dec; 40(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 1486732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards.
Schreier BA; Stadler HA
Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]