These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403298)
1. Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Kiratli BJ; Heiner JP; McBeath AA; Wilson MA J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 1403298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. Cohen B; Rushton N J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 7744941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. Kröger H; Miettinen H; Arnala I; Koski E; Rushton N; Suomalainen O J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Oct; 11(10):1526-30. PubMed ID: 8889853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Engh CA; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):1009-20. PubMed ID: 1522088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying Pelvic Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Region-Free Analysis. Parker AM; Yang L; Farzi M; Pozo JM; Frangi AF; Wilkinson JM J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(4):480-485. PubMed ID: 28652104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: analysis protocols and reproducibility. Trevisan C; Bigoni M; Cherubini R; Steiger P; Randelli G; Ortolani S Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Sep; 53(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 8242466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of periprosthetic bone density in hip arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Reproducibility of measurements. Smart RC; Barbagallo S; Slater GL; Kuo RS; Butler SP; Drummond RP; Sekel R J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 8792252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A postmortem analysis. Engh CA; McAuley JP; Sychterz CJ; Sacco ME; Engh CA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Oct; 82(10):1414-20. PubMed ID: 11057469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of bone mineral density and content in rat hindlimb in vitro. Sievänen H; Kannus P; Järvinen M J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Apr; 9(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 8030435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Mortimer ES; Rosenthall L; Paterson I; Bobyn JD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Mar; (324):269-74. PubMed ID: 8595767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Errors in dual-energy X-ray scanning of the hip because of nonuniform fat distribution. Tothill P; Weir N; Loveland J J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23522983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different DXA acquisition modes on monitoring the changes in bone mineral density after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Hakulinen MA; Borg H; Häkkinen A; Parviainen T; Kiviranta I; Jurvelin JS J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22071027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of hip rotation on bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Celik O; Salci Y; Manisali M; Korkusuz F Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2009; 20(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 19619109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of implanted femora after cemented and press-fit total hip arthroplasty in a canine model. Markel MD; Gottsauner-Wolf F; Bogdanske JJ; Wahner HW; Chao EY J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 8326453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of bone density of the proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty--comparison of different DXA acquisition modes. Hakulinen MA; Borg H; Häkkinen A; Parviainen T; Kiviranta I; Jurvelin JS J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 21029977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Rozenberg S; Vandromme J; Neve J; Aguilera A; Muregancuro A; Peretz A; Kinthaert J; Ham H Osteoporos Int; 1995 Jan; 5(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 7703624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants. Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision and accuracy of a transportable dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit for bone mineral measurements in guinea pigs. Fink C; Cooper HJ; Huebner JL; Guilak F; Kraus VB Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Mar; 70(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11907713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-spatial-resolution bone densitometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric region-free analysis. Morris RM; Yang L; Martín-Fernández MA; Pozo JM; Frangi AF; Wilkinson JM Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):532-9. PubMed ID: 25222069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Aldinger PR; Sabo D; Pritsch M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Aug; 73(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 14565592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]