168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403590)
1. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between measurements made with a conventional periodontal pocket probe, an electronic pressure probe and measurements made at surgery.
Galgut PN; Waite IM
Int Dent J; 1990 Dec; 40(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 2276830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of gingival health status on periodontal probing measurements. A clinical study in humans.
Molina GO; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Novaes AB; Taba M
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 6(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 15125016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of electronic and manual constant force probes.
Khocht A; Chang KM
J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9527557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The location of the periodontal probe tip in health and disease.
Hancock EB; Wirthlin MR
J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):124-9. PubMed ID: 6939832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
