168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403590)
21. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
Rams TE; Slots J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
Eickholz P; Kim TS
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Probing and sound in periodontics.
Touyz LZ; Hatchuel DA
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1985 Oct; 40(10):609-10. PubMed ID: 3868840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe.
Marks RG; Low SB; Taylor M; Baggs R; Magnusson I; Clark WB
J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):780-4. PubMed ID: 1753003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of manual and pressure-controlled periodontal probing.
Kalkwarf KL; Kaldahl WB; Patil KD
J Periodontol; 1986 Aug; 57(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 3528451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical and instrument problems in probing the gingival sulcus and periodontal pocket].
Lange DE
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 3868576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attachment level measurements with a constant force electronic probe.
Magnusson I; Clark WB; Marks RG; Gibbs CH; Manouchehr-Pour M; Low SB
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 3162465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The strategy and advantage in use of an electronic probe for attachment measurement.
Clark WB; Magnusson I; Namgung YY; Yang MC
Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 8260002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe.
Magnusson I; Fuller WW; Heins PJ; Rau CF; Gibbs CH; Marks RG; Clark WB
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3162464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gingival resistance to probing forces. II. The effect of inflammation and pressure on probe displacement in beagle dog gingivitis.
Garnick JJ; Keagle JG; Searle JR; King GE; Thompson WO
J Periodontol; 1989 Sep; 60(9):498-505. PubMed ID: 2795417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests.
Reddy MS
Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 9151548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The relationship between probing attachment loss and computerized radiographic analysis in monitoring progression of periodontitis.
Deas DE; Pasquali LA; Yuan CH; Kornman KS
J Periodontol; 1991 Feb; 62(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2027061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gingival attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
Birek P; McCulloch CA; Hardy V
J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Sep; 14(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 3308972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.
Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R; Schotte A; Darius P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8597621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
