These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403611)

  • 1. On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention.
    Roskos-Ewoldsen DR; Fazio RH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Aug; 63(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 1403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of dividing attention during encoding on perceptual priming of unfamiliar visual objects.
    Soldan A; Mangels JA; Cooper LA
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):873-95. PubMed ID: 18821167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.
    Henderson JM; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 2710617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects.
    Smith ER; Fazio RH; Cejka MA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):888-98. PubMed ID: 8939039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.
    Bargh JA; Chaiken S; Govender R; Pratto F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Jun; 62(6):893-912. PubMed ID: 1619549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making.
    Blascovich J; Ernst JM; Tomaka J; Kelsey RM; Salomon KL; Fazio RH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1993 Feb; 64(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8433270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):583-97. PubMed ID: 7644319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based attention is multisensory: co-activation of an object's representations in ignored sensory modalities.
    Molholm S; Martinez A; Shpaner M; Foxe JJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 17650120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli.
    Wolfe JM
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1187-95. PubMed ID: 8184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency judgements: the problem of defining a perceptual event.
    Johnson MK; Peterson MA; Yap EC; Rose PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 2522137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing effects in visual short-term memory: The case of an object's size.
    Makovski T
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1136-1148. PubMed ID: 29845589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not all attention orienting is created equal: recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression.
    Markant J; Worden MS; Amso D
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Apr; 120():28-40. PubMed ID: 25701278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.
    Woodman GF; Vogel EK; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 May; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 11437304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention.
    Sewell DK; Lilburn SD; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1673-1693. PubMed ID: 27031324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The detail is in the difficulty: Challenging search facilitates rich incidental object encoding.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1214-1233. PubMed ID: 32562249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorical relations in shape perception.
    Hummel JE; Stankiewicz BJ
    Spat Vis; 1996; 10(3):201-36. PubMed ID: 9061832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bimodal format effects in working memory.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 15822610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.