294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403938)
1. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
Kaplan I; Mincer HH; Harris EF; Cloyd JS
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners.
Arcoria CJ; Gonzalez JP; Vitasek BA; Wagner MJ
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1533870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
Gordon M; Wasserstein A; Gorfil C; Imber S
J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
Beznos C
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
