These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403945)
1. Naturally occurring undercuts in the retention of an interim oculofacial prosthesis. Driscoll CF; Hughes B; Ostrowski JS J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):652-4. PubMed ID: 1403945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prostheses. Parel SM J Prosthet Dent; 1980 May; 43(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 6928959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A mold technique for orbital prostheses. Jooste C; Bester D; Roets R J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):380-2. PubMed ID: 1507106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions. Hatamleh MM; Haylock C; Watson J; Watts DC Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1186-92. PubMed ID: 20832245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multiple tray technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses. Salinas TJ; Penchas J; Prada-Valverde V; Guerra LR J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 7722931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye. Shifman A J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8455172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technique for magnet replacement in silicone facial prostheses. Lemon JC; Martin JW; Chambers MS; Wesley PJ J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 7722933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unique method of retaining orbital prosthesis with attachment systems - a clinical report. Guttal SS; Akash NR; Prithviraj DR; Lekha K Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24332358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methylmethacrylate implants: a scanning electron microscopic study. Mishima K; Matsunaga N; Amemiya T Ann Plast Surg; 1991 Jun; 26(6):561-3. PubMed ID: 1883164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified bar superstructure for an implant-retained orbital prosthesis. Khan Z; Bowden M; Beam D J Prosthodont; 1994 Jun; 3(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 9227099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A flexible moulage for the fabrication of an orbital prosthesis. Levy M; Schortz RH; Blumenfeld I; Lepley JB J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Apr; 43(4):436-8. PubMed ID: 6928482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fabrication of the ocular portion of an orbital prosthesis. Couillard P; Schaaf NG J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Apr; 35(4):478-81. PubMed ID: 1062617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A modified technique for retention of orbital prosthesis. Shaikh SR; Patil PG; Puri S Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):863-5. PubMed ID: 22484888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction of orbital prostheses using the silicone pattern technique. Oral K; Zini I; Aramany MA J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Oct; 40(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 279692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Orbital volume augmentation with adjustable prefabricated methylmethacrylate subperiosteal implants. Dresner SC; Codère F; Corriveau C Ophthalmic Surg; 1991 Jan; 22(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 2014113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of osseointegration and rare earth magnetic coupling for oculofacial prosthesis retention in the exenterated orbit. Melicher Larson JS; Nerad JA Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 20(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 19561499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]