BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1403993)

  • 1. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. II. Localization of temperature effects on song production and recognition networks in Gryllus firmus.
    Pires A; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug; 171(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 1403993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. I. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus.
    Pires A; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug; 171(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 1403992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical and temporal scaling considerations in a robot model of cricket calling song preference.
    Lund HH; Webb B; Hallam J
    Artif Life; 1998; 4(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 9798277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): selective filters and signal mismatch on two time scales.
    Rothbart MM; Hennig RM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43975. PubMed ID: 22970154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroethology of acoustic communication in field crickets - from signal generation to song recognition in an insect brain.
    Schöneich S
    Prog Neurobiol; 2020 Nov; 194():101882. PubMed ID: 32673695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors.
    Nolen TG; Hoy RR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Oct; 159(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 3783496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetry in cricket song: female preference and proximate mechanism of discrimination.
    Hirtenlehner S; Küng S; Kainz F; Römer H
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Jun; 216(Pt 11):2046-54. PubMed ID: 23470661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of cricket stridulation by a command neuron: efficacy depends on the behavioral state.
    Hedwig B
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 83(2):712-22. PubMed ID: 10669487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lesions of abdominal connectives reveal a conserved organization of the calling song central pattern generator (CPG) network in different cricket species.
    Lin CC; Hedwig B
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2021 Jul; 207(4):533-552. PubMed ID: 34097086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioural integration of auditory and antennal stimulation during phonotaxis in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Haberkern H; Hedwig B
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Nov; 219(Pt 22):3575-3586. PubMed ID: 27609761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of developmental environment on signal-preference coupling in a Hawaiian cricket.
    Grace JL; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2004 Jul; 58(7):1627-33. PubMed ID: 15341166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the choosiness of female crickets change as they age?
    Sarmiento-Ponce EJ; Rogers S; Hedwig B
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Jun; 224(11):. PubMed ID: 34114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A small, computationally flexible network produces the phenotypic diversity of song recognition in crickets.
    Clemens J; Schöneich S; Kostarakos K; Hennig RM; Hedwig B
    Elife; 2021 Nov; 10():. PubMed ID: 34761750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic signalling for mate attraction in crickets: Abdominal ganglia control the timing of the calling song pattern.
    Jacob PF; Hedwig B
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 309():51-66. PubMed ID: 27109338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency tuning and directional sensitivity of tympanal vibrations in the field cricket
    Lankheet MJ; Cerkvenik U; Larsen ON; van Leeuwen JL
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Mar; 14(128):. PubMed ID: 28298611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induced expression of a vestigial sexual signal.
    Gray DA; Hormozi S; Libby FR; Cohen RW
    Biol Lett; 2018 May; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 29769298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerant pattern recognition: evidence from phonotactic responses in the cricket
    Bent AM; Hedwig B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Dec; 288(1965):20211889. PubMed ID: 34905710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo.
    Rothbart MM; Hennig RM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Nov; 198(11):817-25. PubMed ID: 22945775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modular timer networks: abdominal interneurons controlling the chirp and pulse pattern in a cricket calling song.
    Jacob PF; Hedwig B
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2020 Nov; 206(6):921-938. PubMed ID: 33089402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal state transition to switch behavioral strategies in cricket phonotaxis.
    Hommaru N; Shidara H; Ando N; Ogawa H
    J Exp Biol; 2020 Nov; 223(Pt 22):. PubMed ID: 32943581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.