226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1404820)
1. Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare population. Process of care and clinical outcomes.
Udvarhelyi IS; Gatsonis C; Epstein AM; Pashos CL; Newhouse JP; McNeil BJ
JAMA; 1992 Nov; 268(18):2530-6. PubMed ID: 1404820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal changes in the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1987 through 1990.
Pashos CL; Newhouse JP; McNeil BJ
JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(15):1832-6. PubMed ID: 8411527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Certificate of need regulations and use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.
Popescu I; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Rosenthal GE
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(18):2141-7. PubMed ID: 16684984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where do elderly veterans obtain care for acute myocardial infarction: Department of Veterans Affairs or Medicare?
Wright SM; Daley J; Fisher ES; Thibault GE
Health Serv Res; 1997 Feb; 31(6):739-54. PubMed ID: 9018214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in mortality after myocardial revascularization in the elderly. The national Medicare experience.
Peterson ED; Jollis JG; Bebchuk JD; DeLong ER; Muhlbaier LH; Mark DB; Pryor DB
Ann Intern Med; 1994 Dec; 121(12):919-27. PubMed ID: 7978717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of the invasive strategy after acute myocardial infarction on prognosis and secondary preventive medication: a nationwide study of 6364 women and 11,915 men.
Hvelplund A; Galatius S; Madsen M; Sørensen R; Madsen JK; Iversen AZ; Tilsted HH; Helqvist S; Mortensen PE; Nielsen PH; Prescott E; Abildstrøm SZ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 22210585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Wennberg DE; Lucas FL; Siewers AE; Kellett MA; Malenka DJ
JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(16):1961-8. PubMed ID: 15507581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal changes in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, 1992-1996.
Tu JV; Naylor CD; Austin P
CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 10584086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada.
Tu JV; Pashos CL; Naylor CD; Chen E; Normand SL; Newhouse JP; McNeil BJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 May; 336(21):1500-5. PubMed ID: 9154770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries.
Shreibati JB; Baker LC; Hlatky MA
JAMA; 2011 Nov; 306(19):2128-36. PubMed ID: 22089720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the ownership of the admitting hospital make a difference? Outcomes and process of care of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with acute myocardial infarction.
Sloan FA; Trogdon JG; Curtis LH; Schulman KA
Med Care; 2003 Oct; 41(10):1193-205. PubMed ID: 14515115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community factors, hospital characteristics and inter-regional outcome variations following acute myocardial infarction in Canada.
Alter DA; Austin PC; Tu JV;
Can J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 21(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 15776114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regional variation in the management of acute myocardial infarction in the province of Quebec.
Rodrigues EJ; Simpson E; Richard H; Pilote L
Can J Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 18(10):1067-76. PubMed ID: 12420042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Care following acute myocardial infarction in the Veterans Administration Medical Centers: a comparison with Medicare.
Landrum MB; Guadagnoli E; Zummo R; Chin D; McNeil BJ
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1773-92. PubMed ID: 15533186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome in elderly patients undergoing primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial.
Guagliumi G; Stone GW; Cox DA; Stuckey T; Tcheng JE; Turco M; Musumeci G; Griffin JJ; Lansky AJ; Mehran R; Grines CL; Garcia E
Circulation; 2004 Sep; 110(12):1598-604. PubMed ID: 15353506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry.
Maynard C; Litwin PE; Martin JS; Weaver WD
Arch Intern Med; 1992 May; 152(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 1580724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent trends in hospital utilization for acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization in the United States.
Nallamothu BK; Young J; Gurm HS; Pickens G; Safavi K
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 99(6):749-53. PubMed ID: 17350358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Barreto-Filho JA; Wang Y; Rathore SS; Spatz ES; Ross JS; Curtis JP; Nallamothu BK; Normand SL; Krumholz HM
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 174(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 24296747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in procedure use, in-hospital mortality, and illness severity by gender for acute myocardial infarction patients: are answers affected by data source and severity measure?
Iezzoni LI; Ash AS; Shwartz M; Mackiernan YD
Med Care; 1997 Feb; 35(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 9017953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in use of coronary revascularization in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: a tale of two therapies.
Rathore SS; Foody JM; Radford MJ; Krumholz HM
Chest; 2003 Dec; 124(6):2079-86. PubMed ID: 14665483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
