These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 140549)

  • 41. [Value of the Slapak and Partilla ECG leads in the differential diagnosis of Q 3].
    Walter J; Söhnlein B; Hirche U; Kircher S
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1972 Dec; 61(12):1111-20. PubMed ID: 4266233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic reliability of ECG processing by multivariate analysis.
    Brohet C; Richman HG
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():209-13. PubMed ID: 132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A new ECG classifier based on linear prediction techniques.
    Marques de Sá JP; Abreu-Lima C
    Comput Biomed Res; 1986 Jun; 19(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 2940049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of diagnostic ECG results using information and decision theory. Results from the CSE diagnostic study.
    Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1992; 25 Suppl():120-5. PubMed ID: 1297677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Multiple-elektrode measuring system for the electrocardiographic evaluation of the course of acute myocardial infarction (author's transl)].
    Silny J; Hinsen R; Rau G; von Essen R; Merx W; Effert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1979 May; 24(5):106-12. PubMed ID: 375997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
    Willems JL; Lesaffre E
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prehospital 12-lead ECG diagnostic programs.
    Urban MJ; Edmondson DA; Aufderheide TP
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2002 Nov; 20(4):825-41. PubMed ID: 12476882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of synthesized standard 12 leads and Frank vector leads.
    Wolf HK; Rautaharju PM; Unite VC; Stewart J
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():87-97. PubMed ID: 132110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs.
    Macfarlane PW; Melville DI; Horton MR; Bailey JJ
    Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 6450002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new 12-lead pediatric ECG interpretation program.
    Macfarlane PW; Coleman EN; Devine B; Houston A; McLaughlin S; Aitchison TC; Pomphrey EO
    J Electrocardiol; 1990; 23 Suppl():76-81. PubMed ID: 2151043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Multigroup diagnostic classification with a new 'maximal' lead system.
    Kornreich F; Block P; Bourgain R; Lanckriet J; Tiberghien J; Lenders P; Smets P; Reygaert P; Crabbe JP; Raadschelders I
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():121-7. PubMed ID: 132096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [ECG seminar II. The myocardial infarct ECG].
    ZFA (Stuttgart); 1979 Aug; 55(24):1310-2. PubMed ID: 161445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The use of linear regression for the wave morphological classification of ECG-VCGs.
    Liedtke C; Tuna N
    Adv Cardiol; 1978; 21():173-6. PubMed ID: 145790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The missing waveform information in the orthogonal electrocardiogram (Frank leads). II. Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial infarction from "total" surface waveform information.
    Kornreich F; Brismee D
    Circulation; 1973 Nov; 48(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 4270894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Changing electrocardiographic recording technology and diagnostic accuracy of myocardial infarction criteria. Improved standards for evaluation of ECG measurement precision.
    Rautaharju PM; Seale D; Prineas R; Wolf H; Crow R; Warren J
    J Electrocardiol; 1978 Oct; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 361920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Symposium on historical aspect of diagnostics and its future. Progress of computer diagnosis of ECG (author's transl)].
    Akazome T
    Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi; 1973 Nov; 62(11):1488-92. PubMed ID: 4598355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Automatic analysis of electrocardiograph signals in the diagnosis of myocardial infarct].
    Varlamov IuF; Zemtsovskiĭ EV; Kozlovskiĭ BV; Kremer IuR; Orlov MG
    Med Tekh; 1975; (5):21-7. PubMed ID: 765669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.