These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1405519)

  • 1. Environmental concern and cooperative-competitive behavior in a simulated commons dilemma.
    Smith JM; Bell PA
    J Soc Psychol; 1992 Aug; 132(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 1405519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pro-Environmental Values Matter in Competitive but Not Cooperative Commons Dilemmas.
    Sussman R; Lavallee LF; Gifford R
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 26020292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competitiveness and conflict behavior in simulation of a social dilemma.
    Houston JM; Kinnie J; Lupo B; Terry C; Ho SS
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1219-25. PubMed ID: 10932584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management.
    Rustagi D; Engel S; Kosfeld M
    Science; 2010 Nov; 330(6006):961-5. PubMed ID: 21071668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies.
    Hauge TC; Ferris DP; Seidler RD
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293583. PubMed ID: 37943863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitude adaptation in satisficing games.
    Nokleby M; Stirling W
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2009 Dec; 39(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 19556204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: the roles of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction.
    Wolf ST; Insko CA; Kirchner JL; Wildschut T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Mar; 94(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 18284293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves.
    Liberman V; Samuels SM; Ross L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1175-85. PubMed ID: 15359020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social science. Cooperation and the commons.
    Vollan B; Ostrom E
    Science; 2010 Nov; 330(6006):923-4. PubMed ID: 21071656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diminished cooperativeness of psychopaths in a prisoner's dilemma game yields higher rewards.
    Mokros A; Menner B; Eisenbarth H; Alpers GW; Lange KW; Osterheider M
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2008 May; 117(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 18489216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games with common resource dynamics.
    Wakano JY
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 17512952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmentalism as a trait: gauging people's prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement.
    Kaiser FG; Byrka K
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 46(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 22044135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selfishness, fraternity, and other-regarding preference in spatial evolutionary games.
    Szabó G; Szolnoki A
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Apr; 299():81-7. PubMed ID: 21420978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperativeness and competitiveness as two distinct constructs: validating the Cooperative and Competitive Personality Scale in a social dilemma context.
    Lu S; Au WT; Jiang F; Xie X; Yam P
    Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(6):1135-47. PubMed ID: 23145818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A game theoretical model of deforestation in human-environment relationships.
    Rodrigues A; Koeppl H; Ohtsuki H; Satake A
    J Theor Biol; 2009 May; 258(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 19490882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas.
    Kortenkamp KV; Moore CF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):603-15. PubMed ID: 16702154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm.
    Halevy N; Bornstein G; Sagiv L
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Apr; 19(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 18399895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personal view: the paradox of runaway competitions in gastroenterology.
    Sonnenberg A
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Apr; 23(7):871-8. PubMed ID: 16573789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the social costs of narcissism: the case of the tragedy of the commons.
    Campbell WK; Bush CP; Brunell AB; Shelton J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1358-68. PubMed ID: 16143668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid skills: drinking games and alcohol consumption among Australian university students.
    Polizzotto MN; Saw MM; Tjhung I; Chua EH; Stockwell TR
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 Sep; 26(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 17701509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.