These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1405548)

  • 1. Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC).
    Christopherson LA; Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 1405548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy.
    Schultz MC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 5027358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Modified Rhyme Test results from impaired- and normal-hearing listeners.
    Elkins EF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 5163893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences Between Young and Older Adults in Working Memory and Performance on the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities
    Humes LE; Kidd GR; Lentz JJ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():804891. PubMed ID: 35095690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW; Talis HP
    Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
    van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods.
    Singh G; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):733-40. PubMed ID: 20874047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric functions for discrimination of two-component complex tones in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; Rosengard PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2454-65. PubMed ID: 10212426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD; Rowan D; van Besouw RM; Allsopp AA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability in clinical electrocochleography.
    Bergholtz LM; Hooper RE; Mehta DC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1976; 85(5 Pt.1):679-85. PubMed ID: 984659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
    Klein AJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the auditory numbers test to evaluate speech perception abilities of hearing-impaired children.
    Erber NP
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Nov; 45(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 7442166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in auditory discrimination of spectral shape and speech-identification performance among elderly listeners.
    Shrivastav MN; Humes LE; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1131-42. PubMed ID: 16521774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners.
    Coughlin M; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3597-607. PubMed ID: 9857518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.