BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1405993)

  • 41. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Intraoperative monitoring of early auditory evoked potentials in hearing acoustic neuroma patients complemented by cochlear nerve action potentials].
    Taniguchi M; Müller K; Schramm J; Rödel R
    HNO; 1992 May; 40(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 1612935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preservation of the auditory nerve function after translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma.
    Kiyomizu K; Matsuda K; Nakayama M; Tono T; Matsuura K; Kawano H; Toyama K; Komune S
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Mar; 33(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16310997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?
    James ML; Husain AM
    Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(10):1551-5. PubMed ID: 16301480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [An experimental study of the auditory brainstem implant in guinea pigs].
    Cao K; Shi X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Hu K
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1994 Dec; 16(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 7720137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Intraoperative monitoring auditory function during surgery of internal auditory canal and C-P angle].
    Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(3):141-3, 189-90. PubMed ID: 1419190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nucleus 21-channel auditory brainstem implant in patients with previous tumour removal.
    Wu H; Kalamarides M; Bouccara D; Dahan EA; Sollmann WP; Viala P; Rey A; Sterkers O
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 11093608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
    Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Monitoring Cochlear Nerve Integrity During Vestibular Schwannoma Microsurgery in Real-Time Using Cochlear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response and Streaming Neural Response Imaging.
    Patel NS; Saoji AA; Olund AP; Carlson ML
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):e201-e207. PubMed ID: 31923158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of anesthesia on evoked auditory responses in pediatric auditory brainstem implant surgery.
    Wong K; Kiringoda R; Kanumuri VV; Barber SR; Franck K; Sahani N; Brown MC; Herrmann BS; Lee DJ
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Feb; 130(2):507-513. PubMed ID: 31095742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Preliminary study of intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery].
    Yu LM; Yang SM; Han DY; Yu LM; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 41(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 16848284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Properties of auditory brainstem responses evoked by intra-operative electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus in human subjects.
    Waring MD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):538-48. PubMed ID: 8980418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evoked facial nerve EMG and brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring in cerebellopontine angle tumor resection.
    Lin CM; Hsu JC; Wu RS; Wu KC; Yu CL; Wu HF; Tan PP
    Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1997 Sep; 35(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 9407677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.