223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1406237)
1. [Toxicological basis for evaluating health risk].
Rolecki R; Dutkiewicz T; Kończalik J
Med Pr; 1992; 43(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 1406237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Pollut; 2005 Dec; 138(3):379-411. PubMed ID: 16098930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.
Crump KS; Hoel DG; Langley CH; Peto R
Cancer Res; 1976 Sep; 36(9 pt.1):2973-9. PubMed ID: 975067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Future of toxicology--low-dose toxicology and risk--benefit analysis.
Rietjens IM; Alink GM
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 19(8):977-81. PubMed ID: 16918235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the national toxicology program report on carcinogens.
Rodu B; Cole P; Mandel JS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Oct; 64(1):186-8. PubMed ID: 22810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Environmental mutagenesis and use of biomarkers in cancer risk prediction].
Cuenca P; Ramírez V
Rev Biol Trop; 2004 Sep; 52(3):585-90. PubMed ID: 17361552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.
Hays SM; Becker RA; Leung HW; Aylward LL; Pyatt DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 17030369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Calculation of the median effective dose and median effective time using a generalized model based on the Waibull distribution].
Antomonov MIu; Bogorad VS
Gig Sanit; 1992; (5-6):61-4. PubMed ID: 1398186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mathematical dose-effect models in the study of carcinogenesis].
Parfenov IuD
Vopr Onkol; 1986; 32(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 3511610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Problems in prediction of toxicity and risk of effects of chemical substances on public health].
Rumiantsev GI; Novikov SM
Gig Sanit; 1997; (6):13-8. PubMed ID: 9483844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A goal-oriented approach to reducing industrially related carcinogenic risks.
Deisler PF
Drug Metab Rev; 1982; 13(5):875-911. PubMed ID: 6754313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Exposure to carcinogens in work environment today. State of the art, problems and prospects raised by the Law 626/94].
Carnevale F; Baldasseroni A
Med Lav; 1998; 89(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 9673099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [International-cooperative studies on carcinogenicity evaluation of environmental chemicals].
Hayashi Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Mar; 12(3 Pt 2):579-84. PubMed ID: 3985632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Various suggestions on the unification of methods for experimental substantiation of maximum permissible concentration of chemical carcinogens].
Litvinov NN; Titova TA
Gig Sanit; 1977 Oct; (10):69-73. PubMed ID: 598727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Precautionary principle for toxic chemicals - no alternative to safeguard societal benefits.
Jostmann T
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):847-9; discussion 875-6. PubMed ID: 18042578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologically based models for risk assessment.
Portier CJ; Hoel DG; Kaplan NL; Kopp A
IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):20-8. PubMed ID: 2228117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prevention of carcinogenicity risks in work environment].
Terracini B
Med Lav; 1998; 89(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 9673098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Toxicological evaluation of inhalation noxae: test methods, assessment of toxic action and hazard potential, threshold limit values].
Kleinsasser N
Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 May; 83 Suppl 1():S36-53. PubMed ID: 15118947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
