These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1406237)
61. An approach to the detection of environmental tumour promoters by a short-term cultured-cell assay. Moulé Y Food Addit Contam; 1984; 1(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 6536531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Advantages and disadvantages of using human cells for pharmacological and toxicological studies. Hawksworth GM Hum Exp Toxicol; 1994 Aug; 13(8):568-73. PubMed ID: 7946513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The use of biological markers in toxicology. Henderson RF; Bechtold WE; Bond JA; Sun JD Crit Rev Toxicol; 1989; 20(2):65-82. PubMed ID: 2686696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Toxicological consequences of multiple chemical interactions: a primer. Calabrese EJ Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 105(2-3):121-35. PubMed ID: 8571351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A toxicologist's guide to biomarkers of hepatic response. Amacher DE Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002 May; 21(5):253-62. PubMed ID: 12141396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Risk assessment: short-term exposure at various ages. Gaylor DW Basic Life Sci; 1988; 43():173-6. PubMed ID: 3365217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Chemical carcinogens in the environment: risk assessment for the environment. Nielsen PA Pharmacol Toxicol; 1993; 72 Suppl 1():46-50. PubMed ID: 8474989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluation of environmental carcinogens for cancer in man. Brown AL Oncology; 1976; 33(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 980369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. How much cancer can EPA regulate away? Gough M Risk Anal; 1990 Mar; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2330433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Mouse or molecule? Mechanism-based toxicology in cancer risk assessment. Lang L Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Apr; 103(4):334-6. PubMed ID: 7607132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Report of an independent peer review of an acrylonitrile risk assessment. Haber LT; Patterson J Hum Exp Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 24(10):487-527. PubMed ID: 16270753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Biomarkers in toxicology versus ecological risk assessment. Eason C; O'Halloran K Toxicology; 2002 Dec; 181-182():517-21. PubMed ID: 12505361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Carcinogenesis. Dose-response relationship and threshold concepts. Kotin P Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1976; 271():22-8. PubMed ID: 1069507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Assessment of safety/risk of chemicals: inception and evolution of the ADI and dose-response modeling procedures. Lu FC; Sielken RL Toxicol Lett; 1991 Dec; 59(1-3):5-40. PubMed ID: 1755034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Molecular epidemiology: low-dose carcinogens and genetic susceptibility. Vineis P Int J Cancer; 1997 Mar; 71(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9096656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. From quantal counts to mechanisms and systems: the past, present, and future of biometrics in environmental toxicology. Bailer AJ; Piegorsch WW Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 10877286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Global prevention of environmental and occupational cancer. Landrigan PJ; Espina C; Neira M Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jul; 119(7):A280-1. PubMed ID: 21719377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. [Probability assessment of the effective and threshold dosages in a toxicological experiment]. Shtabskiĭ BM; Krasovskiĭ GN; Kudrina VN; Zholdakova ZI Gig Sanit; 1979 Sep; (9):41-5. PubMed ID: 499879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]