These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14064177)

  • 1. STANDARDIZATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH ACOUSTIC LABORATORIES' RECORDINGS OF PHONETICALLY BALANCED MONOSYLLABIC WORD LISTS.
    MACRAE JH; WOODROFFE P; FARRANT RH
    J Otolaryngol Soc Aust; 1963 Sep; 1():197-203. PubMed ID: 14064177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Qualitative vocal audiometry; lists of words grouped phonetically].
    LAFON JC
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1956; 150(2):413-4. PubMed ID: 13343696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RANGE OF DIFFICULTY OF FOUR HARVARD PHONETICALLY BALANCED WORD LISTS.
    BURKE KS; SHUTTS RE; KING WP
    Laryngoscope; 1965 Feb; 75():289-96. PubMed ID: 14270677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of speaker differences on the intelligibility of phonetically balanced word lists.
    PALMER JM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1955 Jun; 20(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 14382080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification and discrimination of speech sounds in monosyllabic meaningful words and nonsense words by children.
    Zakrzewski A; Jassem W; Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A
    Audiology; 1975; 14(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 1147842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Luganda speech audiometry.
    Nsamba C
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 526196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Vocal audiometry: the "phonatome" recognition test. Principle, technique, initial results].
    Carrat R; Carrat X
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1992; 113(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 1344553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech audiometry: digitization effects and the non-equivalence of isophonemic word lists.
    James CJ; Bowsher JM; Simpson PJ
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Apr; 25(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 1829010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [New articulation lists for speech audiometry. Part II].
    Pruszewicz A; Demenko G; Richter L; Wika T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 7970764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New articulation lists for speech audiometry. Part I].
    Pruszewicz A; Demenko G; Richter L; Wika T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 7970763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Phonetic analysis of the Portuguese language as spoken in Brazil and its application to audiometry].
    DE SA G
    Rev Bras Med; 1952 Jul; 9(7):482-90. PubMed ID: 13064475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [List of words phonetically balanced for vocal audiometry in the Catalan language].
    Serra-Raventós M
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1971; 22(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 5163585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Statistical study of the phonetic composition of the Italian language and its practical application to audiometry of words].
    BOCCA E; PELLEGRINI A
    Arch Ital Otol Rinol Laringol Suppl; 1950 Sep; 61(Suppl. 5):116-41. PubMed ID: 14791062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New articulation lists matched phonematically and structurally].
    Zakrzewski A; Pruszewicz A; Kubzdela H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1971; 25(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 5093482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Pascoe DP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rationale and standardization for a combined speech articulation and auditory discrimination test.
    Hutchinson BB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 5127190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Examination of Sources of Variability Across the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Test in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Bierer JA; Spindler E; Bierer SM; Wright R
    Trends Hear; 2016 May; 20():. PubMed ID: 27194155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Various recordings of the german speech intelligibility test (DIN 45 621 recommendation) (author's transl)].
    Keller F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1977 Dec; 22(12):292-8. PubMed ID: 597556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. COMPARATIVE INTELLIGIBILITY OF WORD LISTS AND CONTINUOUS DISCOURSE.
    GIOLAS TG; EPSTEIN A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1963 Dec; 6():349-58. PubMed ID: 14071872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.