These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14064830)

  • 41. Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16461510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [APROPOS OF THE ARTICLE, "PARTIAL PROTECTION OF THE PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN FROM RADIATION IN ROENTGENOLOGIC EXAMINATIONS", BY V. A. GULIAEV].
    ALIEV MB
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1963; 38():66. PubMed ID: 14136144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Evaluation of the feasibility of using dosimetric equipment for measuring long-wave X-ray radiation].
    Shurupov SB; Konts GI
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1989; (6):45-6. PubMed ID: 2767489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Letter: We are being fooled with these "genetically significant doses" from diagnostic x-ray.
    Prêtre S
    Health Phys; 1973 Aug; 25(2):201. PubMed ID: 4784262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. SAFE PROCEDURES IN RADIATION.
    SIMON N
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1963 Sep; 56():425-30. PubMed ID: 14048359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reducing patient exposure to ionizing radiation--is it really necessary?
    Thomas RH; Busick DD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Nov; 37(11):657-64. PubMed ID: 1033663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Fetus radiation doses from nuclear medicine and radiology diagnostic procedures. Potential risks and radiation protection instructions].
    Markou P
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2007; 10(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 17450255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ethical issues for radiographers: general observations and a pilot qualitative study.
    Gruppetta E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(2):88-9. PubMed ID: 19525503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Evaluation of the field of radiation and of the dose to health personnel in scintigraphic examinations with Tc99m for the determination of the work area].
    Voegelin MR; La Cava G; Gori C; Grandonico F
    Radiol Med; 1978 Oct; 64(10):1146-7. PubMed ID: 734181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. SENTINEL Project special initiative: ethical and justification issues in medical radiation protection.
    Malone J; O'Connor U; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19589879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements): its contribution to dosimetry in diagnostic and interventional radiology.
    Wambersie A; Zoetelief J; Menzel HG; Paretzke H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):7-12. PubMed ID: 16461541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Problems of radiation protection in radiodiagnosis].
    Barke R; Gursky S
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1972; 13(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 4637755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The department of protection evaluation and dosimetry of the Institute of Radiology of the University of Palermo].
    Laconi A
    Minerva Med; 1972 Nov; 63(78):4229-44. PubMed ID: 5081749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patient and staff doses in radiology and cardiology in Estonia.
    Filippova I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):59-61. PubMed ID: 16461509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Estimation of staff lens doses during interventional procedures. Comparing cardiology, neuroradiology and interventional radiology.
    Vano E; Sanchez RM; Fernandez JM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):279-83. PubMed ID: 25848117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Study on evaluation method of patient dose in diagnostic radiology required for introducing the guidance level: investigation of entrance surface dose of patient using direct measurement by TLD].
    Iwanami S; Ishiguchi T; Ishigaki T; Koga S; Niibe H; Aburano T; Irifune T; Kaneko M; Kusakabe K; Kusama T; Sasaki T; Sasaki Y; Shibuya H; Takayama M; Nakamura H; Nohara N; Hiramatsu Y; Fujioka M; Machida K; Ookouchi Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Jun; 60(7):396-405. PubMed ID: 10921299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Variations in the radiation dose received by the patient in diagnostic radiology.
    OSBORN SB
    Br J Radiol; 1963 Apr; 36():230-4. PubMed ID: 13940486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland.
    Aroua A; Besançon A; Buchillier-Decka I; Trueb P; Valley JF; Verdun FR; Zeller W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15266081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Paediatric doses from diagnostic radiology in Victoria.
    Boal TJ; Cardillo I; Einsiedel PF
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Jun; 21(2):57-67. PubMed ID: 9745791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT.
    Mayo-Smith WW; Hara AK; Mahesh M; Sahani DV; Pavlicek W
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):657-72. PubMed ID: 25420167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.