135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1406941)
1. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Chief says panel backs courts' use of a genetic test.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, A23. PubMed ID: 11647446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits.
Mellon JN
Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic witness: by thy DNA so shall ye be known.
Smith DM
Health Law J; 1993; 1():207-44. PubMed ID: 10569856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Academy under fire over plans for new study of DNA statistics..
Macilwain C
Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):101. PubMed ID: 8114894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA fingerprinting: academy reports.
Roberts L
Science; 1992 Apr; 256(5055):300-1. PubMed ID: 1566077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.
Kaye DH
Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 20408376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statement by DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics concerning the National Academy of Sciences report on DNA Technology in Forensic Science in the USA.
Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Apr; 59(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8505025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA fingerprinting reconsidered (again).
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1992 Jul; 267(1):26. PubMed ID: 1502508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science & justice--DNA and the courts.
Sedley S
Sci Justice; 2005; 45(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 16080318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pointing Fingers. DNA identification is called into question.
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1992 Mar; 266(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 1585145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NAS report: strengthen agbio regs and relations. National Academy of Sciences.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 May; 18(5):486. PubMed ID: 10802605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic population genetics and the National Research Council (NRC).
Weir BS
Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 8430704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA tests in criminal prosecutions. Too much evidence or not enough?
Hoke PA
J Leg Med; 1990 Dec; 11(4):481-512. PubMed ID: 2292668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting wildlife.
Littlehales C
Anal Chem; 1999 Nov; 71(21):749A-752A. PubMed ID: 10565270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain.
McDonald R
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The DNA paternity test: legislating the future paternity action.
Shapiro ED; Reifler S; Psome CL
Leg Med; 1993; ():233-82. PubMed ID: 7907160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forensic DNA tests.
Weedn VW
Clin Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 16(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 8867590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
