135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1406941)
21. The challenge of identifying deceased individuals in Brazil: from dictatorship to DNA analysis.
Guimarães MA
Sci Justice; 2003; 43(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 14714290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA forensic science 1995.
Morton NE
Eur J Hum Genet; 1995; 3(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7552142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences: formulating AIDS policy.
Weiss R; Thier SO
Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 3131820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Getting DNA to bear witness.
Simons DH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun; 134(22):50. PubMed ID: 12827740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. U.S. science policy. Obama courts a smitten audience at the national academy.
Mervis J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):576-7. PubMed ID: 19407168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
Fung WK; Hu YQ
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA fingerprinting from tissues after variable postmortem periods.
Ludes B; Pfitzinger H; Mangin P
J Forensic Sci; 1993 May; 38(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 8515219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Forensic nurse, crime experts, urge U.S. Senators to overhaul DNA analysis system.
Minor Nurse Newsl; 2002; 9(2):1. PubMed ID: 12164071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Genetic structure of forensic populations.
Morton NE
Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Sep; 55(3):587-8. PubMed ID: 8079999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Bioterrorism. NAS censors report on agriculture threats.
Mervis J; Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1973-5. PubMed ID: 12242412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials.
Roberts H
Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. NAS study supports enhanced funding for nuclear medicine research.
J Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 48(11):14N-7N, 22N. PubMed ID: 17978345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comments on the statistical aspects of the NRC's report on DNA typing.
Devlin B; Risch N; Roeder K
J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 8113709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Forensic hair morphology comparison--a dying art or junk science?
Taupin JM
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15112598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The NAS cholesterol report--a reply to editorial criticism from a member of the Food and Nutrition Board.
Herbert V
Hosp Pract; 1980 Sep; 15(9):21. PubMed ID: 7409790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA evidence will be admissible if the proper foundation is laid: advice for a forensic medicine expert.
Pitluck HM
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 11387626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advancing justice for sexual assault survivors and innocent inmates, or threat to privacy? A controversial DNA technology proposal.
Hackenschmidt A
J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Dec; 30(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15565046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. NAS set to study veterinary research trends.
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2003 Apr; 222(7):925. PubMed ID: 12685775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The forensic debut of the NRC's DNA report: population structure, ceiling frequencies and the need for numbers.
Kaye DH
Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):99-105. PubMed ID: 7607463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Report of the Institute of Medicine: Academic geriatrics for the year 2000. Committee on Leadership for Academic Geriatric Medicine.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Aug; 35(8):773-91. PubMed ID: 3611568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
