These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14074555)
1. DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING. GREGORY RL Nature; 1963 Aug; 199():678-80. PubMed ID: 14074555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A discussion of G. H. Fisher's 'towards a new explanation for the geometrical illusions: apparent depth or contour proximity?' and the inappropriate constancy-scaling theory. Gregory RL Br J Psychol; 1973 Nov; 64(4):623-6. PubMed ID: 4757897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Emmert's law in the Ames room. Dwyer J; Ashton R; Broerse J Perception; 1990; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2336333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The case for misapplied constancy scaling: depth associations elicited by illusion configurations. Ward LM; Porac C; Coren S; Girgus JS Am J Psychol; 1977 Dec; 90(4):609-20. PubMed ID: 610448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception. Weintraub DJ Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():263-89. PubMed ID: 1094929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Triangles and squares look smaller than they are: some new illusions of extent. Treisman M Perception; 1983; 12(6):701-5. PubMed ID: 6678413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation. Day RH Science; 1972 Mar; 175(4028):1335-40. PubMed ID: 5059563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A note on inappropriate constancy-scaling and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Gauld A Br J Psychol; 1975 Aug; 66(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 1237336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An experimental and theoretical appraisal of the perspective and size-constancy theories of illusions. Fisher GH Q J Exp Psychol; 1970 Nov; 22(4):631-52. PubMed ID: 5490811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards a new explantation for the geometrical illusions. II. Apparent depth or contour proximity? Fisher GH Br J Psychol; 1973 Nov; 64(4):607-21. PubMed ID: 4757896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Illusory Distance Modulates Perceived Size of Afterimage despite the Disappearance of Depth Cues. Qian J; Liu S; Lei Q PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159228. PubMed ID: 27391335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are size illusions in simple line drawings affected by shading? Zanker JM; Abdullah AA Perception; 2004; 33(12):1475-82. PubMed ID: 15729914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Figural aftereffects as optical illusions? Stadler M Am J Psychol; 1972 Sep; 85(3):351-75. PubMed ID: 4655810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A test of Gregory's theory of primary constancy scaling. Worrall N Am J Psychol; 1974 Sep; 87(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 4455098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comments on the inappropriate constancy scaling theory of the illusions and its implications. Gregory RL Q J Exp Psychol; 1967 Aug; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 6074164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The aperture problem in egocentric motion. Murakami I Trends Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 27(4):174-7. PubMed ID: 15108685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age. Chevrier J; Delorme A Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haptic illusions and inappropriate constancy scaling. Over R Nature; 1967 May; 214(5088):629. PubMed ID: 6036180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]