106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1407614)
1. [Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac index and ejection fraction in ischemic heart disease. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance, thermodilution and cineventriculography].
Talarico G; Saino A; Lotto A
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1992 Jun; 40(6):203-9. PubMed ID: 1407614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.
Spiess BD; Patel MA; Soltow LO; Wright IH
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 11687996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Determination of cardiac output by thoracic electric impedance: comparison with thermodilution].
Delfino M; Carlone S; Angelici E; Zona C; Del Bolgia F; Nigri A; Serra P; Reale A
G Ital Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 14(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6714547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure--noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution.
Castor G; Molter G; Helms J; Niedermark I; Altmayer P
Crit Care Med; 1990 May; 18(5):544-6. PubMed ID: 2183967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].
Shimizu H; Seki S; Mizuguchi A; Tsuchida H; Watanabe H; Namiki A
Masui; 1990 Apr; 39(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 2362347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The usefulness of bioimpedance in patient monitoring in an intensive-therapy heart-surgery unit: a comparison with thermodilution].
Ferraro S; D'Alto M; Maddalena G; Golino A; Liguori L; Jannelli G; Spampinato N; Chiariello M
Cardiologia; 1993 Sep; 38(9):577-83. PubMed ID: 8287387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impedance cardiography versus invasive measurements of stroke volume index in patients with chronic heart failure.
Kieback AG; Borges AC; Schink T; Baumann G; Laule M
Int J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 143(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 19144427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The non-invasive assessment of stroke volume and cardiac output by impedance cardiography: a review.
Newman DG; Callister R
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Aug; 70(8):780-9. PubMed ID: 10447052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of thoracic electrical bioimpedance in detection of ejection fraction changes.
Hartleb M; Rudzki K; Waluga M; Janusz M; Karpel E
J Physiol Pharmacol; 2000 Mar; 51(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 10768858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The dependability of noninvasive stroke volume measurements with impedance cardiography].
Slany J; Mösslacher H; Kronik G; Schmoliner R
Acta Med Austriaca; 1978; 5(4-5):118-21. PubMed ID: 756116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output in CAPD patients.
Ng HW; Walleyl TJ; Tsao Y; Fahal IH; Ahmad R; Breckenridge AM
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1995; 17(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7623522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
