124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1408167)
21. [Postoperative normalization of prolonged P100m latency in the visual evoked magnetic field in a patient with occipital meningioma].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Seki K; Hatanaka K; Mizoi K; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1997 Apr; 49(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 9125747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Human brain response to visual stimulus between lower/upper visual fields and cerebral hemispheres.
Lee B; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R; Sakai Y
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 19643151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal profile of visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal stimulation analyzed with a whole-head magnetometer.
Hashimoto T; Kashii S; Kikuchi M; Honda Y; Nagamine T; Shibasaki H
Exp Brain Res; 1999 Apr; 125(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 10229028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of different half-field stimulations on the pattern reversal visually evoked cortical potential.
Orban D; Müller W
Ophthalmologica; 1990; 201(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 2392275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
Hoffmann MB; Flechner JJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses.
Hoffmann MB; Straube S; Bach M
J Vis; 2003; 3(6):432-9. PubMed ID: 12901714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual evoked magnetic fields to flash and pattern in 100 normal subjects.
Armstrong RA; Slaven A; Harding GF
Vision Res; 1991; 31(11):1859-64. PubMed ID: 1771769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hemi-field pattern visual evoked potentials: a comparison of display and analysis techniques.
Towle VL; Brigell M; Spire JP
Brain Topogr; 1989; 1(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 2641269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Topographic mapping of the visual evoked potential after source derivation.
Carreño-Rimaudo SV; Catelli-Infantosi AF
Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 7968865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.
Onofrj M; Fulgente T; Thomas A; Malatesta G; Peresson M; Locatelli T; Martinelli V; Comi G
Brain Topogr; 1995; 7(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 7599021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feature-specific information processing precedes concerted activation in human visual cortex.
Ramkumar P; Jas M; Pannasch S; Hari R; Parkkonen L
J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(18):7691-9. PubMed ID: 23637162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of the hemisphere activated by hemifield visual stimulation using a single equivalent dipole model.
Brigell M; Rubboli G; Celesia GG
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Nov; 87(5):291-9. PubMed ID: 7693440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pattern-evoked potential latencies from central and peripheral visual fields.
Jones DC; Blume WT
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 17(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 10709812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic responses of human visual cortex to illusory contours.
Ohtani Y; Okamura S; Shibasaki T; Arakawa A; Yoshida Y; Toyama K; Ejima Y
Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 321(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 11880200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The application of Laplacian analysis in the recording of half-field pattern-onset evoked potentials.
Riemslag FC; Beers AP; Spekreijse H
Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 80(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1505341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low- and high-frequency evoked responses following pattern reversal stimuli: a MEG study supported by fMRI constraint.
Perfetti B; Franciotti R; Della Penna S; Ferretti A; Caulo M; Romani GL; Onofrj M
Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1152-67. PubMed ID: 17337346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields.
Orban D; Müller W
Ophthalmologica; 1991; 202(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 2057192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with FMRI signals in human visual cortex.
Whittingstall K; Wilson D; Schmidt M; Stroink G
Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18841455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
