These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1408183)
1. New acuity test for toddlers. Woodhouse JM; Adoh TO; Oduwaiye KA; Batchelor BG; Megji S; Unwin N; Jones N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Apr; 12(2):249-51. PubMed ID: 1408183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cardiff Test: a new visual acuity test for toddlers and children with intellectual impairment. A preliminary report. Adoh TO; Woodhouse JM; Oduwaiye KA Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 1641223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System. Wen J; Yang B; Cui J; Wang L; Li X J Vis Exp; 2023 Mar; (193):. PubMed ID: 37010307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests. Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New method of assessing visual acuity with pictures. Kay H Br J Ophthalmol; 1983 Feb; 67(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 6821677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between grating acuity measured by visual tracking and preferential looking in infants. Lengyel D; Gottlob I Strabismus; 2003 Jun; 11(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 12854016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of forced preferential looking for measurement of visual acuity in a population of neurologically impaired children. Duckman RH; Selenow A Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Oct; 60(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 6228150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contour interaction in the preschool child. Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Saccade latencies during a preferential looking task and objective scoring of grating acuity in children with and without visual impairments. Barsingerhorn AD; Boonstra FN; Goossens J Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):616-625. PubMed ID: 30734501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acuity measurements in adult subjects using a preferential looking test. Woodhouse JM; Morjaria SA; Adler PM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17239190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acuity assessment of non-verbal infants and children: clinical experience with the acuity card procedure. Mohn G; van Hof-van Duin J; Fetter WP; de Groot L; Hage M Dev Med Child Neurol; 1988 Apr; 30(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 3384203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Grating Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Electronic Acuity Card: The Dobson Card. Mohan KM; Miller JM; Harvey EM; Gerhart KD; Apple HP; Apple D; Smith JM; Davis AL; Leonard-Green T; Campus I; Dennis LK J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016; 53(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 26836005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vanishing optotypes. New type of acuity test letters. Frisén L Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1194-8. PubMed ID: 3741251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children: the acuity card procedure. Teller DY; McDonald MA; Preston K; Sebris SL; Dobson V Dev Med Child Neurol; 1986 Dec; 28(6):779-89. PubMed ID: 3817317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of visual acuity in adult patients with strabismic amblyopia: a comparison between the preferential looking method and different acuity charts. Rydberg A Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1997 Dec; 75(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 9527317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The acuity card procedure: a rapid test of infant acuity. McDonald MA; Dobson V; Sebris SL; Baitch L; Varner D; Teller DY Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Aug; 26(8):1158-62. PubMed ID: 4019107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]