These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1408266)
1. Possible changes in store for PRO program. Harrop DE Pa Med; 1992 Jul; 95(7):34. PubMed ID: 1408266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process. Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review program; solicitation of comments on proposed PRO program scope of work--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(218):46702. PubMed ID: 10300403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission. Weeks HS W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program, utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29041-50. PubMed ID: 10299607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review shifts focus to patterns of care. Carlson B Indiana Med; 1994; 87(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 7806858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicare program; acquisition, protection and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(74):14977-86. PubMed ID: 10273479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare program; utilization and quality control Peer Review Organization (PRO) area designations--HCFA. Final notice. Fed Regist; 1984 Feb; 49(39):7209-10. PubMed ID: 10273454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicare programs; utilization and quality control peer reviews organization (PRO) area designations and definitions of eligible organizations--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1983 Aug; 48(158):36970-5. PubMed ID: 10273375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the PROs. Scala M Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2001; 2(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Program; solicitation of comments on proposed PRO program scope of work--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1983 Aug; 48(168):39160. PubMed ID: 10273387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]