These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1409088)

  • 1. Cytometry in histological sections of colon carcinoma.
    Rodenacker K; Aubele M; Burger G; Gais P; Jütting U; Gössner W; Oberholzer M
    Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):556-60. PubMed ID: 1409088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confocal DNA cytometry: a contour-based segmentation algorithm for automated three-dimensional image segmentation.
    Beliën JA; van Ginkel HA; Tekola P; Ploeger LS; Poulin NM; Baak JP; van Diest PJ
    Cytometry; 2002 Sep; 49(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 12210606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cell nucleus analyses on the heterogenicity, proliferation and metastasis of malignant tumors].
    Kunze KD; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Meyer W; Theissig F
    Acta Histochem Suppl; 1990; 39():147-54. PubMed ID: 1964231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
    Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
    Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Image analysis of DNA cytometry for assessing prognosis after resection of esophageal cancer].
    Böttger T; Störkel S; Stöckle M; Wahl W; Heintz A; Jugenheimer M; Effenberger-Kim O; Vinh T; Junginger T
    Chirurg; 1991 Jun; 62(6):467-72; discussion 472-3. PubMed ID: 1655366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
    Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
    Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in DNA aneuploid cell content during tumor dissociation in human colon and head and neck cancers analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Ensley JF; Maciorowski Z; Hassan M; Pietraszkiewicz H; Sakr W; Heilbrun LK
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(5):550-8. PubMed ID: 8354128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative DNA analysis of fresh solid tumors by flow and image cytometric methods: a comparison using the Roche Pathology Workstation Image Analyzer.
    Ellison DA; Maygarden SJ; Novotny DB
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Apr; 8(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 7617654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined morphometrical and syntactic structure analysis as tools for histomorphological insight into human lung carcinoma growth.
    Kayser K; Stute H; Bubenzer J; Paul J
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Apr; 2(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 2177350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized image analysis and flow cytometric evaluation of ovarian borderline tumors: a study of 24 cases.
    Esposito MJ; Fuchs A
    Cytometry; 1994 Dec; 18(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 7895528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An automated image cytometry system for monitoring DNA ploidy and other cell features of radiotherapy and chemotherapy patients.
    Zhang Y; LeRiche JC; Jackson SM; Garner D; Palcic B
    Radiat Med; 1999; 17(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 10378652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
    Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
    Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow and image cytometry for DNA analysis in bladder washings: improved concordance by using internal reference for flow.
    Chabanas A; Rambeaud JJ; Seigneurin D; Fradet Y; Lawrence JJ; Faure G
    Cytometry; 1993 Nov; 14(8):943-50. PubMed ID: 8287737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
    Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML
    Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of aneuploid subpopulations in colon cancer biopsies by cultivation in vitro prior to flow cytometric analysis.
    Rutz HP; Calmès JM; Burri F; Givel JC; Mirimanoff RO
    Helv Chir Acta; 1992 Aug; 59(2):355-8. PubMed ID: 1428926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous nuclear antigen and DNA content quantitation using paraffin-embedded colonic tissue and multiparameter flow cytometry.
    Bauer KD; Clevenger CV; Endow RK; Murad T; Epstein AL; Scarpelli DG
    Cancer Res; 1986 May; 46(5):2428-34. PubMed ID: 3516382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional image processing for morphometric analysis of epithelium sections.
    Albert R; Schindewolf T; Baumann I; Harms H
    Cytometry; 1992; 13(7):759-65. PubMed ID: 1451606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Retrospective flow-cytometric analysis of the DNA content in colorectal carcinomas and the test of the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy].
    Baretton G; Gille J; Oevermann E; Löhrs U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1990; 74():233-7. PubMed ID: 1708591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation.
    Danque PO; Chen HB; Patil J; Jagirdar J; Orsatti G; Paronetto F
    Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of image analysis of imprints with flow cytometry for DNA analysis of solid tumors.
    Claud RD; Weinstein RS; Howeedy A; Straus AK; Coon JS
    Mod Pathol; 1989 Sep; 2(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 2813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.