These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14093858)

  • 41. [STUDY OF RELAPSE. CLINICAL IMPORTANCE AND SEMIOLOGIC VALUE].
    MASPETIOL R; SEMETTE D
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1964; 81():637-42. PubMed ID: 14237532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hearing of modulation in sounds.
    Kay RH
    Physiol Rev; 1982 Jul; 62(3):894-975. PubMed ID: 7045902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Stimulus coding in the cat's auditory nerve. Preliminary report.
    KIANG NY; WATANABE T; THOMAS EC; CLARK LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1962 Dec; 71():1009-26. PubMed ID: 14032447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modeled auditory nerve responses to amplitude modulated cochlear implant stimulation.
    van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Kalkman RK; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():19-33. PubMed ID: 28625417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [ON HEARING IN ANIMALS].
    SCHWARTZKOPFF J
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1963 Dec; 182():435-53. PubMed ID: 14116980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia.
    Cullen JK; Ellis MS; Berlin CI; Lousteau RJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972; 74(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 5068755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Separation of the cerebro-audiogram (CAG), neuro-audiogram (NAG) and oto-audiogram (OAG) in the objection audiometry].
    Spreng M; Keidel WD
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1967; 189(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 5595706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Electric-acoustic interactions in the hearing cochlea: single fiber recordings.
    Tillein J; Hartmann R; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():112-26. PubMed ID: 25285621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [ELECTRICAL RESPONSES OF THE PERIPHERAL PORTION OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM OF VARIOUS MAMMALS].
    BARU AV; MARUSEVA AM
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1963 Nov; 49():1330-6. PubMed ID: 14140917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Hearing preservation and tinnitus following removal of acoustic neurinomas].
    Kurokawa Y; Uede T; Ohtaki M; Tanabe S; Hashi K
    No Shinkei Geka; 1996 Apr; 24(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 8934884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stimulus coding in the cochlear nucleus.
    Kiang NY; Pfeiffer RR; Warr WB; Backus AS
    Trans Am Otol Soc; 1965; 53():35-58. PubMed ID: 5834666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION OF VISUAL AND ACOUSTIC AFFERENT RESPONSES OF SHORT LATENCY IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE CAT].
    DA FONSECA JS; MOREIRA J; GUERRA MC
    J Med (Oporto); 1963 Aug; 51():871-3. PubMed ID: 14049537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Promontory stimulation following translabyrinthine excision of acoustic neuroma with preservation of the cochlear nerve.
    Vrabec JT; Lambert PR; Arts HA; Ruth RA
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):643-7. PubMed ID: 8588670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. DIRECT STIMULATION OF AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS.
    LAWRENCE M
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1964 Oct; 80():367-8. PubMed ID: 14198698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Feasibility of multichannel human cochlear nucleus stimulation.
    Luetje CM; Whittaker CK; Geier L; Mediavilla SJ; Shallop JK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jan; 102(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1731154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Value of electric stimulation of the promontory in man. Preliminary report].
    Gersdorff M; Bertrand B
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1978; 32(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 707076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.
    von Ilberg C; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Pfenningdorff T; Hartmann R; Stürzebecher E; Klinke R
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 10545807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. COCHLEAR POTENTIALS AND 8 NERVE ACTION POTENTIALS IN NORMAL AND GENETICALLY DEAF MICE.
    MIKAELIAN D; ALFORD BR; RUBEN RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1965 Mar; 74():146-57. PubMed ID: 14265617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Electric stimulation of the acoustic nerve in totally deaf persons. Current status of clinical use].
    Burian K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Apr; 104(14):485-8. PubMed ID: 312188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.