These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OBTAINED BY DIFFERENT UROGRAPHIC METHODS]. UBERSAX R; SARASIN R; LERUDULIER JL Radiol Clin; 1963; 32():495-510. PubMed ID: 14107406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: association with urographic visualization during ERCP. Roszler MH; Campbell WL Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):595-8. PubMed ID: 4059544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MEGLUMINE IOTHALAMATE 60 PER CENT AND SODIUM DIATRIZOATE 50 PER CENT. COMPARISON OF UROGRAPHIC QUALITY AND SIDE-EFFECTS. DOTTER CT; JUDKINS MP Radiology; 1964 Feb; 82():225. PubMed ID: 14115299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment urographic evaluation in invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Komolafe F; Ojengebede O; Adelusi B Afr J Med Med Sci; 1989 Dec; 18(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 2558564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of urographic contrast media, with particular reference to the aetiology and prevention of certain side effects. INMAN GK Br J Radiol; 1952 Dec; 25(300):625-31. PubMed ID: 12997665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Miokon: a new urographic contrast medium; clinical comparison with hypaque. ALDERSON DA; BUCKY NL Br J Radiol; 1957 Jun; 30(354):322-3. PubMed ID: 13426521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Sudah M; Vanninen RL; Partanen K; Kainulainen S; Malinen A; Heino A; Ala-Opas M Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 11930053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diminished radiopacity of contrast material: a urographic sign of ureteral calculus. Korobkin M; Jacobs RP; Clark RE; Minagi H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Nov; 131(5):847-50. PubMed ID: 101042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [OUR EXPERIENCE WITH VESICO-URETERAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN. ITS UROGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS]. LEFEBVRE J; PARIENTY R; HOFF J J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1965; 46():11-6. PubMed ID: 14305554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Procedure for urographic examination]. Brunswic H J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1969 May; 50(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 5401319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]