These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410323)

  • 1. [Evaluation of different methods of control of film processing].
    Lenzen H; Fiebich M; Kötter L; Meier N
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):377-83. PubMed ID: 1410323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assurance from the viewpoint of the x-ray film industry].
    von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):367-76. PubMed ID: 1410322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality control during processing of film in x-ray establishments].
    Hoberg B
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jul; 41(7):248-52. PubMed ID: 3413585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Introductory remarks of the Editor to the comments on the paper "The visual method for constancy testing of film processing" by H. Eder].
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Sep; 1(5):226-31. PubMed ID: 1751557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis as specified in DIN 6868].
    Lenzen H; Wiesmann W
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 3344348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A constancy test for quality assurance of x-ray film including film processing].
    Eder H; Schöfer H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1985 Jan; 38(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 3975787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The visual method for inspecting film processing in accordance with Section 16 of the German X-ray Ordinance (the Bavarian alternative). Fundamental principles and initial results].
    Eder H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jul; 1(4):159-63. PubMed ID: 1911890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance in stereotactic space. Determination of the accuracy of aim and dose in single dose radiosurgery].
    Mack A; Mack G; Weltz D; Hönes A; Jess A; Wowra B; Czempiel H; Heck B; Kreiner HJ; Seifert V; Böttcher H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Nov; 179(11):760-6. PubMed ID: 14605746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany].
    Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of preexposed step wedges in acceptance tests of film processing in mammography].
    Blendl C
    Radiologe; 2003 Mar; 43(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 12664240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].
    Blendl C; Goergens K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):288-92. PubMed ID: 9894529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assurance measures within DIN 6856: the adaptation of film viewing boxes and their specifications in the radiology department of a university hospital. Deutsche Industrie-Norm].
    Kirchner J; Kollath J
    Rofo; 1996 Feb; 164(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 8679977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Sources of error in the quality assurance of x-ray equipment].
    Meier N; Lenzen H; Fiebich M
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):384-8. PubMed ID: 1410324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality control of laser imagers].
    Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The determination of the point of time in processing archived X-ray films].
    Blendl C; Löbach W; Owert P
    Radiologe; 2003 Mar; 43(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 12664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.