458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410347)
1. Nonpalpable breast microcalcifications: frequency, management, and results of incisional biopsy.
Homer MJ
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):411-3. PubMed ID: 1410347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions detected on screening mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Revenas K; Mantas D; Antonopoulou Z; Kontzoglou K; Nikiteas N; Kyriakou V
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 15991535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated stereotactic core needle biopsy of microcalcifications with correlation to surgical biopsy.
Roth WD; von Smitten K; Heikkilä P; Edgren J; Laasonen L
Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):390-3. PubMed ID: 10394866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotaxic localization and core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: two-year follow-up of a prospective study.
Head JF; Haynes AE; Elliott MC; Elliott RL
Am Surg; 1996 Dec; 62(12):1018-23. PubMed ID: 8955240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures.
Penco S; Rizzo S; Bozzini AC; Latronico A; Menna S; Cassano E; Bellomi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1255-60. PubMed ID: 20966337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC
Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Follow-up of surgical biopsies in microcalcifications of the breast. Comparative analysis of patients submitted to mammography and digitalization of mammographic images].
Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Vento AR; Naninato P; Zanetti A; Carli L
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):933-6. PubMed ID: 9411295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Cariaggi MP
Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 9332236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
Charpin C; Garcia S
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients.
Forgeard C; Benchaib M; Guerin N; Thiesse P; Mignotte H; Faure C; Clement-Chassagne C; Treilleux I
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 18585676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stereotactic and ultrasound guided fine-needle cytology in nonpalpable breast lesions].
Vielh P; Klijanienko J
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 9754384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biopsy for microcalcification detected by mammography.
Roses DF; Harris MN; Gorstein F; Gumport SL
Surgery; 1980 Mar; 87(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 6244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Aid to diagnosis?].
Chopier J; Seror JY; Antoine M; Sananes S; Merviel P; Amram S; Uzan S; Bigot JM
J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 78(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9499951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical importance of breast microcalcifications: report on 112 cases.
Abbes M; Vergnet F; Aubanel D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1988 Dec; 14(6):651-61. PubMed ID: 3056750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy.
Berg WA; Hruban RH; Kumar D; Singh HR; Brem RF; Gatewood OM
Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1111-30. PubMed ID: 8888394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotaxic needle localization and biopsy of occult breast lesions: first year's experience.
Elliott RL; Haynes AE; Bolin JA; Boagni EM; Head JF
Am Surg; 1992 Feb; 58(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 1550304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
