These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410347)

  • 21. A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease.
    Hansell DM; Cooke JC; Parsons CA; Evans SH; Dance DR; Bliss JM; Llesley I
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):21-5. PubMed ID: 2832028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.
    Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Murphy WA; DeSchryver-Kecskemeti K
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 644055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microcalcifications in the breast--a blessing or a curse? A critical review.
    Lanyi M
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):126-45. PubMed ID: 3849364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: mammographic appearance and histologic correlation.
    Helvie MA; Hessler C; Frank TS; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):759-64. PubMed ID: 2027988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Management following mammography revealing grouped microcalcifications without palpable tumor].
    Le Gal M; Durand JC; Laurent M; Pellier D
    Nouv Presse Med; 1976 Jun; 5(26):1623-7. PubMed ID: 940755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications obtained using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit.
    Ward SE; Taves DH; McCurdy LI
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2000 Feb; 51(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10711288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stereotactic breast biopsy: en bloc excision of microcalcifications with a large-bore cannula device.
    Damascelli B; Frigerio LF; Patelli G; Lanocita R; Viganotti G; Uslenghi E; Ticha V; Conti A; Bohm S; De Simone T; Vespro V
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):895-900. PubMed ID: 10511143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographically detected breast clustered microcalcifications localized by chest thin-section computed tomography.
    Liu X; Bao Y; Sui L; Cao J; Wang Y; Yu C; Qiao G; Cong Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 38419107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Needle localization and biopsy in non-palpable lesions of the breast: an eight-year experience.
    Laraja RD; Rothenberg RE; Herbert L; Pryce EH
    N Y State J Med; 1992 Feb; 92(2):71. PubMed ID: 1314357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Non-palpable breast lesions: radio-pathologic correlations on open excisional biopsies. Significance of the choice of technique for minimal excisional biopsy].
    Chopier J; Antoine M; Duffaut C; Bazot M; Annani T; Kadoch O; Bigot JM; Uzan S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Dec; 28(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 11192195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
    Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
    Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fine-needle cytology and core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. When appropriate?].
    Grumbach Y
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 9754380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polyhedral microcalcifications at mammography: histologic correlation with calcium oxalate.
    Frouge C; Meunier M; Guinebretière JM; Gilles R; Vanel D; Contesso G; Di Paola R; Bléry M
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):681-4. PubMed ID: 8430173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Can it replace open biopsy?
    Layfield LJ; Parkinson B; Wong J; Giuliano AE; Bassett LW
    Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):2007-11. PubMed ID: 1913550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Displacement of microcalcifications during stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy with marking clip placement: case report.
    Lee SG; Piccoli CW; Hughes JS
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):495-7. PubMed ID: 11323477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.