These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410395)
1. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Suit alleging RNs & MDs responsible for brain injury to newborn dismissed. Case on point: C.A. v. Bentolila, A-1261-11T1 NJSUP (8/9/2012)-NJ. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Aug; 53(3):4. PubMed ID: 22997684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are nurses held to same standards of care as physicians? Case in point: Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (6 Cal Rptr. 2d 900-CA [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jun; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 1626055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurse "pushed the baby back into the womb". Case in point: De Leon v. Hosp. of Albert Einstein Col. (566 N.Y.S 2d 213--NY 1991). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Apr; 31(11):2. PubMed ID: 2041872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When nurses should blow the whistle. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Apr; 27(11):1. PubMed ID: 3647528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electric shock for infant: disciplinary action for nurse. Case in point: Cafiero v. N.C. Board of Nursing (403 S.E. 2d 582--NC (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):4. PubMed ID: 1862215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]