These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410395)

  • 21. Are physicians "primed" by nurses?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):1. PubMed ID: 1454992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When nurses must question doctors' orders.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):1. PubMed ID: 3347755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nurse's notes make the difference.
    Nursing; 1988 Nov; 18(11):98-9. PubMed ID: 3211426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Newborn trauma mystery: Res Ipsa Loquitur.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Feb; 29(9):1. PubMed ID: 2928552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nurses testify as hostile witnesses.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):1. PubMed ID: 3368574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should nurses have questioned dr.'s orders? Cerny V. Williams, No. 2004-10053 (09/19/2006) -NY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):4. PubMed ID: 17117603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nurses fail to timely respond: uterus ruptures--neurological injuries. Case on point: Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hosp., 2002 WL 1269344 S.E.2d.-VA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jun; 43(1):2. PubMed ID: 12154444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Did Ob R.N. fail to timely report decelerations?
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):2. PubMed ID: 10223025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.