These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1410710)

  • 1. The use of generalized estimating equations for risk assessment in developmental toxicity.
    Ryan L
    Risk Anal; 1992 Sep; 12(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 1410710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood models for clustered binary and continuous outcomes: application to developmental toxicology.
    Regan MM; Catalano PJ
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):760-8. PubMed ID: 11315004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):764-76. PubMed ID: 7662858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applications of multinomial dose-response models in developmental toxicity risk assessment.
    Krewski D; Zhu Y
    Risk Anal; 1994 Aug; 14(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 7972962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regression models and risk estimation for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes in developmental toxicology.
    Regan MM; Catalano PJ
    Risk Anal; 2000 Jun; 20(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 10949415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of methods for estimating the benchmark dose based on overdispersed data from developmental toxicity studies.
    Fung KY; Marro L; Krewski D
    Risk Anal; 1998 Jun; 18(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 9664728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating variance functions in developmental toxicity studies.
    Bowman D; Chen JJ; George EO
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1523-8. PubMed ID: 8589237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of trinomial responses from reproductive and developmental toxicity experiments.
    Chen JJ; Kodell RL; Howe RB; Gaylor DW
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):1049-58. PubMed ID: 1742429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 1581483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exact trend test for correlated binary data.
    Corcoran C; Ryan L; Senchaudhuri P; Mehta C; Patel N; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 11550948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling fetal death and malformation in developmental toxicity studies.
    Catalano P; Ryan L; Scharfstein D
    Risk Anal; 1994 Aug; 14(4):629-37. PubMed ID: 7972963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. III. Statistical models.
    Allen BC; Kavlock RJ; Kimmel CA; Faustman EM
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):496-509. PubMed ID: 7867901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitting nonlinear and constrained generalized estimating equations with optimization software.
    Contreras M; Ryan LM
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1268-71. PubMed ID: 11129490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint models for toxicology studies with dose-dependent number of implantations.
    Allen AS; Barnhart HX
    Risk Anal; 2002 Dec; 22(6):1165-73. PubMed ID: 12530786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal designs for estimating the effective dose in developmental toxicity experiments.
    Krewski D; Smythe R; Fung KY
    Risk Anal; 2002 Dec; 22(6):1195-205. PubMed ID: 12530789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology.
    Williams DA
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):305-9. PubMed ID: 3358995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simulation study of the influence of study design on the estimation of benchmark doses for developmental toxicity.
    Kavlock RJ; Schmid JE; Setzer RW
    Risk Anal; 1996 Jun; 16(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 8693165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mathematical modeling of reproductive and developmental toxic effects for quantitative risk assessment.
    Kodell RL; Howe RB; Chen JJ; Gaylor DW
    Risk Anal; 1991 Dec; 11(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 1780500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.