These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14114914)

  • 21. EXTINCTION OF THE HUMAN EYELID CR AS A FUNCTION OF THE DISCRIMINABILITY OF THE CHANGE FROM ACQUISITION TO EXTINCTION.
    SPENCE KW; HOMZIE MJ; RUTLEDGE EF
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():545-52. PubMed ID: 14155417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning.
    Schnur P; Ksir CJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 May; 80(2):388-9. PubMed ID: 5786452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EXTINCTION AND SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY OF THE EYELID CR AS A FUNCTION OF DELAY OF THE UCS AND THE INTERVAL BETWEEN ACQUISITION AND EXTINCTION.
    LOCKARD JS; LOCKARD RB; GRANT DA
    J Gen Psychol; 1964 Jul; 71():161-7. PubMed ID: 14183371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONS UPON EYELID CONDITIONING.
    NICHOLLS MF; KIMBLE GA
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():400-2. PubMed ID: 14165657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of conditioned appetitive stimuli on the acquisition and extinction of a runway response.
    Bolles RC; Grossen NE; Hargrave GE; Duncan PM
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Jul; 85(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 5458319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.
    ROSS LE; SPENCE KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1960 Jun; 59():379-82. PubMed ID: 14439169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EFFECT OF A READY SIGNAL ON THE LATENCY OF VOLUNTARY RESPONSES IN EYELID CONDITIONING.
    GOODRICH KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 May; 67():496-8. PubMed ID: 14171911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EFFECT OF A READY SIGNAL ON THE LATINCY OF VOLUNTARY RESPONSES EN EYELID CONDITIONING.
    GOODRICH KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 May; 67():496-8. PubMed ID: 14171244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. STIMULUS INTENSITY EFFECTS DEPEND UPON THE TYPE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN.
    GRICE GR; HUNTER JJ
    Psychol Rev; 1964 Jul; 71():247-56. PubMed ID: 14183610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CS intensity effects on rabbit nictitating membrane conditioning, extinction and generalization.
    Scavio MJ; Gormezano I
    Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1974; 9(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 4220361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [THE FUNCTIONAL ROLES OF THE AUDITORY AND MOTOR ANALIZERS IN ELABORATING GENERALIZATION IN THE 1ST AND 2D SIGNAL SYSTEMS].
    ZAKLIAKOVA VN
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1963; 13():980-6. PubMed ID: 14136226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of rate and contingency of classical and instrumental reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of the human eyelid CR.
    Fleming RA; Grant DA
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Oct; 72(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 5969719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. RESPONSE MEDIATION OF THE CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE.
    GRICE GR; HUNTER JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Oct; 66():338-46. PubMed ID: 14053251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RELATION OF EYELID CONDITIONING TO MANIFEST ANXIETY, EXTRAVERSION, AND RIGIDITY.
    SPENCE KW; SPENCE JT
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Feb; 68():144-9. PubMed ID: 14117964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Partial reinforcement effects in classical aversive conditioning in rabbits and human beings.
    Leonard DW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 1150940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EFFECT OF PATTERN OF REINFORCEMENT ON THE CONDITIONED EYELID RESPONSE.
    PASSEY GE; WOOD DL
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():241-4. PubMed ID: 14047763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Secondary reinforcement in children as a function of conditioning associations, extinction percentages, and stimulus types.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():455-9. PubMed ID: 13936959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".
    Fleming RA; Cerekwicki LE; Grant DA
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jun; 77(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 5655123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.