These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1411562)

  • 41. Responding to stimuli.
    Mahapatra A
    ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NIH: in line with expectations.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6514):461. PubMed ID: 7845447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Endoscopic research in America (revisited).
    Sivak MV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Dec; 58(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 14652560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. NIH retains research funds for the future.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6606):203. PubMed ID: 8918864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. US health bodies reap funds for bioterrorism.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9308):771. PubMed ID: 11888599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biomedical boom, forget the rest?
    Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):965. PubMed ID: 11234028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. NIH intramural program endangered.
    Grouse LD
    JAMA; 1980 Mar; 243(11):1166. PubMed ID: 7359669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A lost generation.
    Weinberg RA
    Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. NIH funding mechanisms need little defense.
    Lichtenstein LM
    Science; 1993 Jul; 261(5117):17, 113. PubMed ID: 8316846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. NIH basks in broad support.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):522. PubMed ID: 9468124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. NIH budget. A new kind of earmarking.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5107):483. PubMed ID: 8475380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A proposal to mobilize public opinion in support of the National Institutes of Health. Commentary.
    Stossel TP
    Curr Opin Hematol; 1994 Jan; 1(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9371252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. NIH heads for 7.1 per cent budget growth.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6655):6. PubMed ID: 9363881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. NIH to review priorities in readiness for future cuts..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6520):294. PubMed ID: 7885453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Priority initiatives in health care and research harmed by budget cuts.
    Kerschner JE
    WMJ; 2013 Jun; 112(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 23894813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The readers' NIH.
    Stevenson I
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):530. PubMed ID: 1411555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Avantaggiati ML
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. NIH funding: what does the future look like?
    Furcht LT
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17431152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.