These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
52. NIH basks in broad support. Wadman M Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):522. PubMed ID: 9468124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. NIH budget. A new kind of earmarking. Anderson C Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5107):483. PubMed ID: 8475380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A proposal to mobilize public opinion in support of the National Institutes of Health. Commentary. Stossel TP Curr Opin Hematol; 1994 Jan; 1(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9371252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. NIH heads for 7.1 per cent budget growth. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6655):6. PubMed ID: 9363881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. NIH to review priorities in readiness for future cuts.. Gavaghan H Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6520):294. PubMed ID: 7885453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Priority initiatives in health care and research harmed by budget cuts. Kerschner JE WMJ; 2013 Jun; 112(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 23894813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The readers' NIH. Stevenson I Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):530. PubMed ID: 1411555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. NIH funding: what does the future look like? Avantaggiati ML Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. NIH funding: what does the future look like? Furcht LT Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17431152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]