These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1411891)

  • 1. Prospective randomized study to compare a closed vault technique using absorbable staples at the time of abdominal hysterectomy versus open vault technique.
    Kalbfleisch RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Oct; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 1411891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal vault granulations after total abdominal hysterectomy using polyglactin for vault closure.
    Tannirandorn Y; Tuchinda K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 May; 84(5):693-6. PubMed ID: 11560220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P; Palmerio G; Zambetti E; Gambarini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of closure versus non-closure of vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy.
    Moustafa M; Elgonaid WE; Massouh H; Beynon WG
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Nov; 28(8):791-4. PubMed ID: 19085546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Abdominal hysterectomy without internal peritonealization: primary vaginal closure with stapler or open and drained vagina].
    Nagele F; Kurz C; Husslein P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 8013858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbable staples in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Buka NJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Feb; 166(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 3336831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Martens MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 1731304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience.
    Marchionni M; Bracco GL; Checcucci V; Carabaneanu A; Coccia EM; Mecacci F; Scarselli G
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 10483537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic effect of the open vaginal vault method in reducing febrile morbidity in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Neuman M; Beller U; Ben Chetrit A; Lavie O; Boldes R; Diamant Y
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):591-3. PubMed ID: 8322135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 1448255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with earlier uterine artery ligation.
    Sinha R; Sundaram M; Nikam YA; Hegde A; Mahajan C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18439511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare skin staples and polypropylene for securing the mesh in inguinal hernia repair.
    Mills IW; McDermott IM; Ratliff DA
    Br J Surg; 1998 Jun; 85(6):790-2. PubMed ID: 9667709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaginal vault dehiscence after hysterectomy.
    Agdi M; Al-Ghafri W; Antolin R; Arrington J; O'Kelley K; Thomson AJ; Tulandi T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 19285921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study.
    Härkki-Sirén P; Sjöberg J; Toivonen J; Tiitinen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):866-71. PubMed ID: 11304971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Steege JF; Lipscomb GH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 9721763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.
    Fanning J; Hilgers RD; Palabrica C
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 7959281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy.
    Bikhchandani J; Agarwal PN; Kant R; Malik VK
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jan; 189(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 15701493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up.
    Morgan DJ; Hunter DC; McCracken G; McClelland HR; Price JH; Dobbs SP
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 17355358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.