These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14119032)

  • 1. A SQUARE-FOOTAGE CALCULATOR FOR X-RAY FILMS.
    WATSON W
    Radiography; 1964 Feb; 30():43-8. PubMed ID: 14119032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DIFFERENCES IN DENSITY IN WET AND DRY X-RAY FILMS.
    CLARKE WG; LATHAM SM
    Br J Radiol; 1965 Jan; 38():63-70. PubMed ID: 14236023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. THE FREQUENCY RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF X-RAY FILMS AND SCREENS.
    MORGAN RH; BATES LM; GOPALARAO UV; MARINARO A
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Aug; 92():426-40. PubMed ID: 14207592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative densitometric study with "Cea," "Dupont," "Gevaert," and "Kodak" radiographic films].
    CEBALLOS LABAT J
    Rev Med Hosp Gen (Mex); 1962; 25():79-95. PubMed ID: 13877560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Principles of modern x-ray film development].
    LIESS G
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1962; 3():392-8. PubMed ID: 13930575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manufacturing of x-ray film for latent image formation.
    CAROTHERS A
    Xray Tech; 1962 Mar; 33():348-50. PubMed ID: 13876741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [3-PHASE TECHNIC--A NEW METHOD FOR THE MAKING OF LARGE-SIZED X-RAY FILMS].
    VIEHWEGER G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1964 Nov; 17():260-6. PubMed ID: 14325146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. THE VERSATILE OCCLUSAL DENTAL X-RAY FILM. II.
    SILHA RE
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1965; 38():51-4 PASSIM. PubMed ID: 14334118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. KODAK RADIOGRAPH DUPLICATING FILM.
    BROWNELL CG; CALLEAR TE; ALLEN MJ
    Med Radiogr Photogr; 1964; 40():41-4. PubMed ID: 14282585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A PRINT FROM A RADIOGRAPHIC FILM IN 60 SECONDS].
    RUYGROK CT; VIJLBRIEF P
    J Belge Radiol; 1963; 46():364-8. PubMed ID: 14074306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. THE EFFECT OF UNIFORM GAMMA RAY FOGGING ON THE DIAGNOSTIC USEFULNESS OF COMMERCIAL X-RAY FILM.
    COPESTAKE GG; MACDONALD JC
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1964 Mar; 15():23-6. PubMed ID: 14135471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EVALUATION OF AN EXPERIMENTAL RAPID X-RAY FILM PROCESSING SYSTEM.
    TEMPLETON AW; MOCKBEE WB
    Radiol Technol; 1964 Sep; 36():83-6. PubMed ID: 14209202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [USE OF A BENT X-RAY FILM HOLDER IN TRAUMATOLOGY].
    KALOUSOVA V
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1963; 38():58-9. PubMed ID: 14054030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reactions to glutaraldehyde with particular reference to radiologists and X-ray technicians.
    Fisher AA
    Cutis; 1981 Aug; 28(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 6456868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study shows inconsistency in film processing quality.
    Pirtle OL
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 8426900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical hitches delay filmless radiology.
    diMonda R
    Hospitals; 1983 Jul; 57(14):48. PubMed ID: 6862409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A device for photoprocessing of radiologic films].
    Novikov VIa; Mishkinis BIa; Chikirdin EG
    Med Tekh; 1993; (6):34. PubMed ID: 8139420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing an X-ray department's operating efficiency.
    Hutchinson J
    N Z Health Hospital; 1991; 43(3):21. PubMed ID: 10112825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologic exchange. Patient dose can be reduced by using 105 mm photofluoro spot films instead of the screen-film cassette spot radiographs.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 2762541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.