These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14120136)

  • 1. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.
    HERRNSTEIN RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jan; 7(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 14120136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.
    HERRNSTEIN RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Mar; 7(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 14130099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.
    Fantino E; Herrnstein RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 5636860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On some determinants of choice in pigeons.
    REYNOLDS GS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jan; 6(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 13986426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TECHNIQUE FOR SUSTAINING BEHAVIOR WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.
    ZIMMERMAN J
    Science; 1963 Nov; 142(3593):682-4. PubMed ID: 14068217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CHAINED VI PERFORMANCE OF PIGEONS MAINTAINED WITH AN ADDED STIMULUS.
    ZIMMERMAN J; FERSTER CB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jan; 7(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 14120148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.
    CHUNG SH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Jan; 8(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 14266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FORCE GRADIENTS IN STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    COLE JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Jul; 8(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 14342030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorical counting.
    Fetterman JG; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2010 Sep; 85(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 20540994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absence of shock-elicited aggression in pigeons.
    Rashotte ME; Dove LD; Looney TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 4856078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.
    GRAF V; BULLOCK DH; BITTERMAN ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Mar; 7(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14130091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on reinforced behavioral variability.
    Doughty AH; Giorno KG; Miller HL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):355-69. PubMed ID: 24122484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An operant analog of food caching in the pigeon (Columba livia).
    Roberts WA
    Learn Behav; 2022 Mar; 50(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 34287804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.
    SHETTLEWORTH S; NEVIN JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Jul; 8(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 14342023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning by pigeons playing against tit-for-tat in an operant prisoner's dilemma.
    Sanabria F; Baker F; Rachlin H
    Learn Behav; 2003 Nov; 31(4):318-31. PubMed ID: 14733481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; House D; Halloran M
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 31845110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SOME NOTES ON TIME OUT FROM REINFORCEMENT.
    ZIMMERMAN J; FERSTER CB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jan; 7(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 14120131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.