These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests. Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On masking in bone-conduction testing. STUDEBAKER GA J Speech Hear Res; 1962 Sep; 5():215-27. PubMed ID: 14037795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Masking and bone conduction. A case report. GOETZINGER CP; PROUD GO; EMBREY JE Acta Otolaryngol; 1962; 54():287-91. PubMed ID: 13899535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of narrow band masking by bone conduction in clinical audiometry]. Pestalozza G; Moretti A; Tenaglia C Ann Laringol Otol Rinol Faringol; 1965; 64(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 5898257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Collapse of the ear canal during masking for bone conduction. Sauer RC; Ford CN Am J Otol; 1986 Jan; 7(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3946583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BONE-CONDUCTION MEASUREMENTS. EFFECTS OF VIBRATOR, PLACEMENT, AND MASKING. DIRKS D Arch Otolaryngol; 1964 Jun; 79():594-9. PubMed ID: 14135076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry. Swanepoel de W; Biagio L J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The limited accuracy of bone-conduction audiometry: its significance in medicolegal assessments. Coles RR; Lutman ME; Robinson DW J Laryngol Otol; 1991 Jul; 105(7):518-21. PubMed ID: 1831487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Masking through bone and MLD (masking level difference): data on the variability of the effect]. Quaranta A; Cervellera G Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1973 Feb; 49(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 4786549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of studies on bone conduction thresholds and the HAIC interim standard for bone conduction audiometry. Olsen WO J Speech Hear Disord; 1969 Feb; 34(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 5765862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Warbled tone masking in bone-conduction audiometry. Prather WF; Shapley JL; Smith RA J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Jun; 13(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 5421452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High-frequency audiometry: air- and electric bone-conduction. Okstad S; Mair IW; Laukli E Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 449():159-60. PubMed ID: 3201942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Probe to the bone-conduction phenomenon]. Zeng X; Gong S; Zhong N Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 18(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 15318631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of masking noise on bone conduction thresholds]. Rakhmilevich AG Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1970; 32(6):67-72. PubMed ID: 5496854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Some effects of bone-conducted masking. Schoeny ZG; Goetzinger CP; Knox AW J Speech Hear Res; 1965 Sep; 8(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 5863550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]