These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14125073)

  • 21. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION FOLLOWING VARIATIONS IN DEPRIVATION LEVEL.
    KALISH HI; HABER A
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():125-8. PubMed ID: 14334226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. THE EFFECT OF DISCRIMINATIVE TRAINING ON THE GRADIENT OF STIMULUS-GENERALIZATION.
    HEINEMANN EG; RUDOLPH RL
    Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():653-8. PubMed ID: 14082662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. TRANSPOSITION AFTER 'SINGLE-STIMULUS' TRAINING.
    MACKINTOSH NJ
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 78():116-9. PubMed ID: 14270411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inverse relationship between discriminability and stimulus generalization as a function of number of test stimuli.
    Marsh GD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Oct; 64(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 6058219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. COMPOUND STIMULI, DRIVE STRENGTH, AND PRIMARY STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    HEALEY AF
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():536-8. PubMed ID: 14285612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mediational processes in primary stimulus generalization.
    Tempone VJ
    Child Dev; 1966 Sep; 37(3):687-96. PubMed ID: 5970585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    MIGLER B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jul; 7(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 14176276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. GENERALIZATION OF AUDITORY INTENSITY AS A FUNCTION OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    PIERREL R; SHERMAN JG; FISCHMAN MW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Oct; 6(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 14055951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF DRIVE LEVEL, AND THE RELATION BETWEEN TWO MEASURES OF RESPONSE STRENGTH.
    NEWMAN JR; GRICE GR
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():357-62. PubMed ID: 14286304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. THE EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON THE SLOPE OF GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS.
    MACKINTOSH NJ
    Br J Psychol; 1965 Feb; 56():87-93. PubMed ID: 14292058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment.
    Honig WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Jul; 9(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 5961506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock.
    Grusec T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 5660704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat.
    Crites RJ; Harris RT; Rosenquist H; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Mar; 10(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 6032521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. GENERALIZED PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT EFFECT.
    BROWN RT; LOGAN FA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():64-9. PubMed ID: 14334245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT.
    HONIG WK; SLIVKA RM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jan; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 14120134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Outcome Probability on Generalization in Predictive Learning.
    Ram H; Struyf D; Vervliet B; Menahem G; Liberman N
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 30777514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.
    HABER A; KALISH HI
    Science; 1963 Oct; 142(3590):412-3. PubMed ID: 14056717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. OPPOSED GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS BASED UPON CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    BONEAU CA; HONIG WK
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jul; 68():89-93. PubMed ID: 14177687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Similarity responding by monkeys in a matching to sample task.
    Wright DC; French GM; Riley DA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Apr; 65(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 4970104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.