These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14133231)

  • 1. THE EFFECT OF VISUAL INTENSITIES UPON THE JUDGMENTS OF LOUDNESS.
    BEVAN W; PRITCHARD JF
    Am J Psychol; 1964 Mar; 77():93-8. PubMed ID: 14133231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness.
    GARNER WR
    J Exp Psychol; 1953 Nov; 46(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 13109142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of vehicle color on loudness judgments.
    Menzel D; Fastl H; Graf R; Hellbrück J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2477-9. PubMed ID: 18529164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AUDITORY AND VISUAL TIME JUDGMENT.
    GOLDSTONE S; GOLDFARB JL
    J Gen Psychol; 1964 Apr; 70():369-87. PubMed ID: 14140126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast.
    Shepard TG; Shavit AY; Veldhuizen MG; Marks LE
    Perception; 2017; 46(3-4):268-282. PubMed ID: 28024444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PROPERTIES OF SOUND AND THE AUDITORY-VISUAL DIFFERENCE IN TIME JUDGMENT.
    GOLDFARB JL; GOLDSTONE S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Oct; 19():606. PubMed ID: 14214737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JUDGMENT OF FILLED AND UNFILLED DURATIONS: INTERSENSORY FACTORS.
    GOLDSTONE S; GOLDFARB JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1963 Dec; 17():763-74. PubMed ID: 14085103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An equal discriminability scale for loudness judgments.
    GARNER WR
    J Exp Psychol; 1952 Mar; 43(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 14927828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of context on the subjective equation of auditory and visual intensities.
    SMITH K; HARDY AH
    Science; 1961 Nov; 134(3490):1623-4. PubMed ID: 13914313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Half-loudness judgments without prior stimulus context.
    GARNER WR
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 May; 55(5):482-5. PubMed ID: 13539337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-stimulus judgments of loudness as a function of presentation-interval.
    BEVAN W; PRITCHARD JF; REED WG
    Am J Psychol; 1962 Dec; 75():612-8. PubMed ID: 13967903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating a model of global psychophysical judgments for brightness: I. Behavioral properties of summations and productions.
    Steingrimsson R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1916-30. PubMed ID: 19933573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of subliminal anchors upon judgments of size.
    BOARDMAN WK; GOLDSTONE S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1962 Jun; 14():475-82. PubMed ID: 13870274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using acoustic reflex threshold, auditory brainstem response and loudness judgments to investigate changes in neural gain following acute unilateral deprivation in normal hearing adults.
    Brotherton H; Plack CJ; Schaette R; Munro KJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():88-95. PubMed ID: 28093315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ABSOLUTE JUDGMENTS OF DISCRETE QUANTITIES RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED OVER TIME.
    ERLICK DE
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 May; 67():475-82. PubMed ID: 14171240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria for same and different judgments and visual comparison strategies of four-year-olds.
    Day MC; Bissell JS
    Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 679776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EFFECT OF "APPARENT" INSTRUCTIONS ON BRIGHTNESS JUDGMENTS.
    LANDAUER AA; RODGER RS
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jul; 68():80-4. PubMed ID: 14177685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of context upon judgments of pitch differences.
    KOESTER T; SCHOENFELD WN
    J Exp Psychol; 1946 Oct; 36():417-30. PubMed ID: 21000773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.