These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1414427)

  • 1. The usefulness of matched pair randomization for medical practice-based research.
    McClatchey MW; Cohen SJ; Reed FM
    Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Sep; 12(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 1414427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.
    Greevy R; Lu B; Silber JH; Rosenbaum P
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 15054030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mounting a community-randomized trial: sample size, matching, selection, and randomization issues in PRISM.
    Watson L; Small R; Brown S; Dawson W; Lumley J
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Jun; 25(3):235-50. PubMed ID: 15157727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).
    Parker DR; Evangelou E; Eaton CB
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 15837446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small.
    Diehr P; Martin DC; Koepsell T; Cheadle A
    Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(13):1491-504. PubMed ID: 7481187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.
    Imai K
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical analysis of modified complete randomized designs: applications to chemo-orientation studies.
    Pilla RS; Kitska DJ; Loader C
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Apr; 208(Pt 7):1267-76. PubMed ID: 15781887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determination for three-level randomized clinical trials with randomization at the first or second level.
    Fazzari MJ; Kim MY; Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):579-99. PubMed ID: 24697506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The merits of breaking the matches: a cautionary tale.
    Donner A; Taljaard M; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):2036-51. PubMed ID: 16927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new u-statistic with superior design sensitivity in matched observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1017-27. PubMed ID: 21175557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased power to detect gene-environment interaction using siblings controls.
    Andrieu N; Dondon MG; Goldstein AM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):705-11. PubMed ID: 16157257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.
    Liu JP; Fan HY; Ma MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 16279349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions.
    Zhang F; Wagner AK; Ross-Degnan D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1252-61. PubMed ID: 21640554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional analysis of mixed Poisson processes with baseline counts: implications for trial design and analysis.
    Cook RJ; Wei W
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 12925513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
    Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs: an extension of the SCRT-R package.
    Bulté I; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 19363188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on the tests for clustered matched-pair binary data.
    Yang Z; Sun X; Hardin JW
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):638-52. PubMed ID: 20976694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.
    Myers RE; Turner B; Weinberg D; Hauck WW; Hyslop T; Brigham T; Rothermel T; Grana J; Schlackman N
    Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 11570828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.