These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1414427)

  • 21. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of matching on the power of randomized community intervention studies.
    Martin DC; Diehr P; Perrin EB; Koepsell TD
    Stat Med; 1993 Feb; 12(3-4):329-38. PubMed ID: 8456215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of an education and feedback intervention on group-model and network-model health maintenance organization physician prescribing behavior.
    Schectman JM; Kanwal NK; Schroth WS; Elinsky EG
    Med Care; 1995 Feb; 33(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7837822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
    Klar N; Darlington G
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When should matching be used in the design of cluster randomized trials?
    Chondros P; Ukoumunne OC; Gunn JM; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5765-5778. PubMed ID: 34390264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interplay between design and analysis for behavioral intervention trials with community as the unit of randomization.
    Green SB; Corle DK; Gail MH; Mark SD; Pee D; Freedman LS; Graubard BI; Lynn WR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Sep; 142(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 7653466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Power of a randomization test in a single case multiple baseline AB design.
    Bouwmeester S; Jongerling J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228355. PubMed ID: 32027683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomized single-case AB phase designs: Prospects and pitfalls.
    Michiels B; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2454-2476. PubMed ID: 30022457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Person-time analysis of paired community intervention trials when the number of communities is small.
    Brookmeyer R; Chen YQ
    Stat Med; 1998 Sep; 17(18):2121-32. PubMed ID: 9789918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimized design and analysis of preclinical intervention studies in vivo.
    Laajala TD; Jumppanen M; Huhtaniemi R; Fey V; Kaur A; Knuuttila M; Aho E; Oksala R; Westermarck J; Mäkelä S; Poutanen M; Aittokallio T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():30723. PubMed ID: 27480578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calculation of power for matched pair studies when randomization is by group.
    Shipley MJ; Smith PG; Dramaix M
    Int J Epidemiol; 1989 Jun; 18(2):457-61. PubMed ID: 2767863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective individual matching: covariate balance and power in a comparative study.
    Makuch RW; Zhang Z; Charpentier PA; Inouye SK
    Stat Med; 1998 Jul; 17(13):1517-26. PubMed ID: 9695196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The choice of product indicators in latent variable interaction models: post hoc analyses.
    Foldnes N; Hagtvet KA
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):444-57. PubMed ID: 24773360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomization by group in studying the effect of drug information in primary care.
    Diwan VK; Eriksson B; Sterky G; Tomson G
    Int J Epidemiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 1544743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization.
    Hsieh FY
    Stat Med; 1988 Nov; 7(11):1195-201. PubMed ID: 3201045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An efficient test based on the inferential model for the non-inferiority of odds ratio in matched-pairs design.
    Wang Z; Jin H; Lu H; Jin Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2831-2841. PubMed ID: 28093963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.