These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Statistical problems of errors caused by vaginal smears in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer; orifice biopsies and chromosomic criteria of intra-epithelial epitheliomas]. MORICARD R Gynecol Obstet (Paris); 1955; 54(3):294-331. PubMed ID: 13251638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [VAGINAL AND CERVICAL CYTOLOGY. COMPARISON BETWEEN CYTOLOGICAL FINDINGS AND BIOPSY FINDINGS]. SJOLIN KE; HORNBAK H Ugeskr Laeger; 1964 Apr; 126():546-8. PubMed ID: 14146594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CORPUS AT THE RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL. RAPHAEL SI; BEEZER JK Trans N Engl Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1963; 17():13-37. PubMed ID: 14192272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of cervical cancer. MARKLEY RL; ROBNETT DA; GALVIN GA Obstet Gynecol; 1955 Jan; 5(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 13224130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. RECENT ADVANCES IN GYNAECOLOGY. MCGARRITY KA Bull Postgrad Comm Med Univ Syd; 1964 Jan; 19():248-60. PubMed ID: 14104105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. RESULTS OF UTERINE CYTOLOGIC EXAMINATION OF 29,302 WOMEN REPORTED TO A CYTOLOGY REGISTRY IN METRO DETROIT. SELZER I J Mich State Med Soc; 1964 Apr; 63():282-9. PubMed ID: 14139587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of vaginal smears in the diagnosis of cervical cancer: sensitivity vs. specificity. PORTER JE Am Pract Dig Treat; 1956 Jul; 7(7):1135-8. PubMed ID: 13327205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The relations between cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix]. GIACOMINI G Riv Ostet Ginecol; 1962 Aug; 17():574-6. PubMed ID: 13947580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prognostic evaluation of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by biopsy and vaginal smear after irradiation therapy]. LIMBURG H; NAPP JH; WILBRAND U Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1952 Aug; 12(8):723-34. PubMed ID: 12980295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CYTOLOGICAL TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENCE OF UTERINE CARCINOMA]. KAURANIEMI T; TIMONEN S; VARA P Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1963; 52():702-8. PubMed ID: 14083875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix--diagnosis by biopsy. FLUHMANN CF; LYONS HM Calif Med; 1960 Mar; 92(3):194-7. PubMed ID: 13823610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN INTRAMUCOSAL AND INVASIVE CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX BY CYTOLOGIC SMEAR. IS IT RELIABLE? ROBERTS TW; LINKINS T Acta Cytol; 1964; 8():280-3. PubMed ID: 14192719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnosis of cervical cancer by dyeing vaginal smears with methylene blue leuco base]. VASIL'EVA VA Vopr Klin Lecheniia Zlokachestvennykh Novoobraz; 1953; 1():68-73. PubMed ID: 13274756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DETECTION OF PRE-INVASIVE CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX (CARCINOMA-IN-SITU). BLUM LL J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1964 Apr; 57():344-5. PubMed ID: 14141000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID CONTENT OF MALIGNANT CELLS IN CERVICAL SMEARS. ATKIN NB Acta Cytol; 1964; 8():68-72. PubMed ID: 14110627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. SPONGE-BIOPSY TECHNIQUE IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX. FAULDS JS Lancet; 1964 Mar; 1(7334):655-7. PubMed ID: 14107942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic value of suspicious and positive cervix smears]. Voss J; Schubel HW; Kruschwitz S Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Feb; 96(6):173-7. PubMed ID: 4825924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HISTOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN THE GENITAL TRACT OF FEMALES WITH CLASS 3 SMEARS. TORRES JE; HOLMQUIAT N; PEREIRA C; MICKAL A; DOUGHERTY CM Acta Cytol; 1964; 8():284-7. PubMed ID: 14192720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]