229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14147509)
1. [ON THE SOCIAL RISKS OF GENETIC DAMAGE BY ROENTGEN DIAGNOSIS].
BENASSI E; PIETROJUSTI M; TORRETTA A
Minerva Radiol Fisioter Radiobiol; 1964 Mar; 16():92-101. PubMed ID: 14147509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [ROENTGENOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS AND A REVIEW OF THEIR INDICATIONS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO GONADAL HAZARD. I. DETERMINATION OF THE GONADAL DOSE].
HRABOVSZKY Z; NIKL I
Magy Radiol; 1964 Apr; 16():65-88. PubMed ID: 14145983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. THE RISK OF DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY.
HOY RJ
J Coll Radiol Australas; 1963 Oct; 7():227-32. PubMed ID: 14074379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiation doses and radiation protection of the gonads in urological roentgen diagnosis].
UEBERALL R
Urol Int; 1962; 13():230-5. PubMed ID: 13923455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is a roentgen examination dangerous?].
Pape R
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1965 Jul; 77(29):518-21. PubMed ID: 5836843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. RADIATION CONTROL: STANDARDIZATION VERSUS FREEDOM.
BROWN RF
Radiology; 1964 Jun; 82():972-6. PubMed ID: 14168915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. GONADAL DOSES RESULTING FROM PANORAMIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS OF THE TEETH.
JUNG T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1965 Jun; 19():745-53. PubMed ID: 14293964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. GONADAL DOSAGES IN INVESTIGATIVE RADIOGRAPHY.
GARN SM; SILVERMAN FN; DAVIS AA
Science; 1964 Mar; 143(3610):1039-40. PubMed ID: 14107428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. WEIGHTED GONADAL DIAGNOSTIC ROENTGEN-RAY DOSES IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL WITH COMMENTS ON X-RAY DOSAGES TO THE GENERAL POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES.
COOLEY RN; BEENTJES LB
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Aug; 92():404-17. PubMed ID: 14207590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [HAZARDS AND DAMAGE CAUSED BY EXPOSURE TO ROENTGEN RAYS IN CHILDHOOD].
LIMONTA A
Lattante; 1964 Mar; 35():132-68. PubMed ID: 14143113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Notes on gonadal absorbed doses in roentgen diagnosis].
Torretta A; Reis F; Pini M
Minerva Med; 1971 Feb; 62(16):779-81. PubMed ID: 5549400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Problem of gonadal doses in roentgendiagnostic irradiations].
Keler A
Vojnosanit Pregl; 1968 Jun; 25(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 5188267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of the quantitative bases for radiation protection.
Pochin EE
Br J Radiol; 1970 Mar; 43(507):155-60. PubMed ID: 5435117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [ON THE GENETIC RADIATION HAZARDS OF CHILDREN IN RADIOGRAMS OF THE HIP].
PAPE R; HARASTA A
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1963 Oct; 113():791-3. PubMed ID: 14094992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. MEDICAL RADIATION: PERSPECTIVES IN RISKS AND REWARDS.
CHAMBERLAIN RH
Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1965 May; 55(5):720-30. PubMed ID: 14287843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Risk of biological damage due to ionizing radiations].
Ricci A
Minerva Med; 1973 Apr; 64(25):1320-33. PubMed ID: 4707831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dosage and darkening in abdominal radiography].
Laubenberger T
Ann Univ Sarav Med; 1968; 15(4):351-405. PubMed ID: 5759502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A RADIOLOGIST LOOKS AT RADIATION PROTECTION PROCEDURES.
GARLAND LH
Radiology; 1964 Jun; 82():963-71. PubMed ID: 14168914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT RADIATION DOSES IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY.
HAMMER-JACOBSEN E
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1963; 222():SUPPL222:1-273. PubMed ID: 14064830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Gonade exposure in roentgen diagnosis of congential hip dislocation].
Kratzsch E
Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1972 Sep; 27(38):1810-4. PubMed ID: 4635449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
