These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1415169)

  • 21. Completeness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, Canada.
    Wang FL; Gabos S; Sibbald B; Lowry RB
    Chronic Dis Can; 2001; 22(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11525721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using State Birth Defects Registries to Evaluate Regional Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening.
    Case AP; Miller SD; McClain MR
    Birth Defects Res; 2017 Nov; 109(18):1414-1422. PubMed ID: 29152920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Using hospital discharge records, birth certificates and a birth defects registry for epidemiological and public health purposes: experience in Emilia-Romagna region (northern Italy)].
    Astolfi G; Bianchi F; Lupi C; Napoli N; Neville A; Verdini E; Verzola A; Calzolari E
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24293493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Birth defects surveillance in Florida: infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source.
    Tanner JP; Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2010 Dec; 88(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 20842648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 1982-1985.
    Lynberg MC; Chavez GF; Edmonds LD; Mulinare J
    Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):650-7. PubMed ID: 8115974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The accuracy of hospital discharge data in recording major congenital anomalies in Australia.
    Schneuer FJ; Lain SJ; Bell JC; Goldsmith S; McIntyre S; Nassar N
    Birth Defects Res; 2021 Nov; 113(18):1313-1323. PubMed ID: 34431628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of defects identified through Minnesota's Birth Defects Information System And Vital Records, 2006-2008.
    Banerjee E; Zabel E; Alexander B
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23270085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Potential impact of pregnancy outcome on the completeness of diagnosis of birth defects, Hawai'i, 1986-2001.
    Forrester MB; Merz RD
    Hawaii Med J; 2007 Feb; 66(2):32, 34-5. PubMed ID: 17393915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of completeness of reporting of oro-facial cleft cases in Arizona using the capture-recapture method.
    Fufaa GD; Joshi V
    J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 22223055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Risk of birth defects increased in multiple births.
    Zhang XH; Qiu LQ; Huang JP
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Jan; 91(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 20890935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Process of and problems in changing a birth defects registry reporting system.
    Druschel C; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross P
    Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S30-6. PubMed ID: 11745842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increasing the utility of population-based birth defects surveillance program data.
    Kirby RS; Nembhard WN
    J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(1):3. PubMed ID: 24893180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhancing methods for population-based birth defects surveillance programs.
    Kirby RS; Nembhard WN
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):3. PubMed ID: 23778691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.
    Cragan JD; Gilboa SM
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 19089857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The methodology of the Utah Birth Defect Network: congenital heart defects as an illustration.
    Feldkamp M; Macleod L; Young L; Lecheminant K; Carey JC
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):693-9. PubMed ID: 16240379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can hospital discharge diagnoses be used for surveillance of surgical-site infections?
    Moro ML; Morsillo F
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Mar; 56(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 15003675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Re: "On the ability of birth defects monitoring to detect new teratogens".
    Irgens LM; Lie RT
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Sep; 128(3):679. PubMed ID: 2843042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network.
    Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies: Thirty-five years of surveillance.
    Nembhard WN; Bower C
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2016 Nov; 106(11):894-904. PubMed ID: 27891787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Birth defects surveillance data from selected states, 1999-2003.
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Dec; 76(12):894-960. PubMed ID: 17109396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.