These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1415257)
1. A cooperative binomial ascertainment model. Ginsburg EKh; Axenovich TI Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Nov; 51(5):1156-60. PubMed ID: 1415257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment. Boehnke M; Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units. Bonney GE Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1202-15. PubMed ID: 9758615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. III. Pedigrees. Shute NC; Ewens WJ Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 3177381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. Vieland VJ; Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The essence of single ascertainment. Hodge SE; Vieland VJ Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1215-23. PubMed ID: 8913762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. II. Generalizations and numerical results. Shute NC; Ewens WJ Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):374-86. PubMed ID: 3177380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset. Dawson DV Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait. Dawson DV; Elston RC Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choice of ascertainment model I. Discrimination between single-proband models by means of birth order data. Stene J Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Oct; 42(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 727713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of ascertainment model II. Discrimination between multi-proband models by means of birth order data. Stene J Ann Hum Genet; 1979 May; 42(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 475336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A family study of panic disorder: reanalysis using a regressive logistic model that incorporates a sibship environment. Hopper JL; Judd FK; Derrick PL; Macaskill GT; Burrows GD Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 2338231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rheumatic fever susceptibility in four ascertainments: regressive segregation on a geometric ascertainment pattern. Sit KH J Hered; 1990; 81(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 2250095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The estimation of phenotype distributions from pedigree data. Winter RM Am J Med Genet; 1980; 7(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 7211963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data. Cordell HJ; Olson JM Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A note on ascertainment probability in the Allen/Hrubec twin model. Holm NV Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1983; 32(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 6684864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ascertainment models for human families selected through several affected children. Stene J Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):455-7. PubMed ID: 719123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]