These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1415406)
1. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response. Eller DP; Robinson LJ; Newman RB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibroacoustic stimulation and nursing intervention in the nonstress test. Auyeung RM; Goldkrand JW J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 2056360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal startle response observed under ultrasonography: a good predictor of a reassuring biophysical profile. Sarinoglu C; Dell J; Mercer BM; Sibai BM Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):599-602. PubMed ID: 8841226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal behavioral state in normal term human pregnancy. Devoe LD; Murray C; Faircloth D; Ramos E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 163(4 Pt 1):1156-61. PubMed ID: 2220921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on the nonstress test at gestational ages of thirty-two weeks or less. Druzin ML; Edersheim TG; Hutson JM; Bond AL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 161(6 Pt 1):1476-8. PubMed ID: 2603902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration. Pietrantoni M; Angel JL; Parsons MT; McClain L; Arango HA; Spellacy WN Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):807-11. PubMed ID: 1923202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blunted fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation associated with maternal intravenous magnesium sulfate therapy. Sherer DM Am J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 11(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 7857429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distance from an intrauterine hydrophone as a factor affecting intrauterine sound pressure levels produced by the vibroacoustic stimulation test. Eller DP; Scardo JA; Dillon AE; Klein AJ; Stramm SL; Newman RB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):523-7. PubMed ID: 7645631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between the response to external light stimulation and behavioral states in the human fetus: how it differs from vibroacoustic stimulation. Kiuchi M; Nagata N; Ikeno S; Terakawa N Early Hum Dev; 2000 May; 58(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 10854802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Sadan O; Glezerman M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 10577612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of abdominal vibroacoustic stimulation on sound and acceleration levels at the head of the fetal sheep. Abrams RM; Peters AJ; Gerhardt KJ Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9241296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical note: simple vibroacoustic foetal stimulator. Stojanović D; Frković A; Filiplić-Stojanović H; Kirincić N J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(6):269-72. PubMed ID: 11780769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy. D'Elia A; Pighetti M; Vanacore F; Fabbrocini G; Arpaia L Early Hum Dev; 2005 May; 81(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 15935921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being. Marden D; McDuffie RS; Allen R; Abitz D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1386-8. PubMed ID: 9215204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]