These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1415856)

  • 1. Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987.
    Zahniser SC; Kendrick JS; Franks AL; Saftlas AF
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Oct; 82(10):1340-4. PubMed ID: 1415856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal operative deliveries in Italy.
    Parazzini F; Cortinovis I; Restelli S; Bortolus R; Tozzi L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Oct; 73(9):698-700. PubMed ID: 7976244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births?
    Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operative delivery during labour: trends and predictive factors.
    Roberts CL; Algert CS; Carnegie M; Peat B
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 16(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 12060312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005-2013: a population-based study.
    Merriam AA; Ananth CV; Wright JD; Siddiq Z; D'Alton ME; Friedman AM
    BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1365-1372. PubMed ID: 28236337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Trends in the frequency of obstetrical operations and perinatal mortality in the Czech Republic in comparison with other countries].
    Stembera Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 1995 Jun; 60(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 7670703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Trends in vaginal assisted deliveries in the Moravian-Silesian region between the years 2002-2011].
    Simetka O; Velebil P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Jun; 77(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 22779725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of recent trends in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in the United Kingdom.
    Meniru GI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 103(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 8616135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socioeconomic and racial differences in obstetric procedures.
    Leyland A
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Aug; 83(8):1178-9. PubMed ID: 8342735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oxytocin augmentation of labour in women with epidural analgesia for reducing operative deliveries.
    Costley PL; East CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD009241. PubMed ID: 22592738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal head circumference, operative delivery, and fetal outcomes: a multi-ethnic population-based cohort study.
    Mujugira A; Osoti A; Deya R; Hawes SE; Phipps AI
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 May; 13():106. PubMed ID: 23651454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe.
    Bergsjø P; Schmidt E; Pusch D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Jul; 90(7):628-32. PubMed ID: 6871130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.
    Kozak LJ; Weeks JD
    Birth; 2002 Sep; 29(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12153645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forceps and vacuum delivery: a survey of North American residency programs.
    Bofill JA; Rust OA; Perry KG; Roberts WE; Martin RW; Morrison JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):622-5. PubMed ID: 8841231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.