These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1415870)
21. Abortion: a legal and public health perspective. Kunins H; Rosenfield A Annu Rev Public Health; 1991; 12():361-82. PubMed ID: 2049141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion remains a live issue. Nicholson RH Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 1743951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception. Wyser-Pratte RC Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Legal aspects involved in the development of anti-progesterones for fertility control. Roberts I Hum Reprod; 1988 Aug; 3(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 3220947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception. Webb AM; Russell J; Elstein M BMJ; 1992 Oct; 305(6859):927-31. PubMed ID: 1458074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Looking beyond judicial deference to agency discretion: a fundamental right of access to RU 486? Silverberg EA Brooklyn Law Rev; 1994; 59(4):1551-615. PubMed ID: 11656497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. RU 486. Rosenfield A Am J Public Health; 1992 Oct; 82(10):1325-6. PubMed ID: 1415852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Roussel-Uclaf to transfer RU 486 rights. Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Apr; 6(7):8. PubMed ID: 12292550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment. Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Europe finds abortion pill is no magic cure-all. Daley S N Y Times Web; 2000 Oct; ():A3. PubMed ID: 12159835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. RU 486 in the United States and Great Britain: a case study in gender bias. Chicoine D Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 16(1):81-113. PubMed ID: 11656262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Improvements seen for RU-486 abortions. Maurice J Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5029):198, 200. PubMed ID: 1925574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. RU 486: how abortion politics have impacted on a potentially useful drug of broad medical application. Regelson W Perspect Biol Med; 1992; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 1501996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. RU-486: learning more about the French abortion drug. Smith L Sun; 1994 May; ():1D, 5D. PubMed ID: 12346325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. International developments in abortion laws: 1977-88. Cook RJ; Dickens BM Am J Public Health; 1988 Oct; 78(10):1305-11. PubMed ID: 3048126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Boycott threat forces French company to abandon RU486. Dorozynski A BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7088):1150. PubMed ID: 9146386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985-1997. Rahman A; Katzive L; Henshaw SK Int Fam Plann Persp; 1998 Jun; 24(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 14627052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]